Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Accordingly, it is very much to the point that P.L. 93-205, The <br />Endangered Species Act of 1973, places a clear responsibility on <br />the Department to consider these problems in any involvement in <br />developing water supplies for energy in the Ya~pa, Green, and adjacent <br />areas of the main stem Colorado River. <br /> <br />For the four endangered species discussed above, although contractual <br />studies are now under way for some, the specific information is not <br />now available which would allow for water supply planning decisions <br />that would eliminate the possibility of extinction of these species. <br />This is an example of the environmental data gap which makes any <br />precipitate decision on the location of energy development facilities <br />and the source of water supply extremely perilous. <br /> <br />The Federal-State streamflow study completed in 1974 for ,the Green <br />River between Fontene11e Reservoir and Flaming Gorge Reservoir, <br />Wyoming, is an example of the type of studies needed. The resultant <br />report, entitled "The Fontene1le Green River Trout Fisheries - <br />Considerations in Its Enhancement and Perpetuation, Including Test <br />Flow Studies of 1973," contains detailed on-site observations under <br />varying flow conditions that can provide accurate recommendations <br />responsive to the needs of the aquatic resources. This is one of <br />the few areas in the Upper Colorado River Basin where sufficient <br />investigations have been conducted to substantiate the water needs <br />peculiar to fish and wildlife. <br /> <br />Similarly, the instream flow methodology developed as part of the <br />Northern Great Plains Resource Program should prove increasingly use- <br />ful in streamflow analyses in other river basins when field testing <br />and refinement have been completed. Field studies are currently under <br />way in some of the priority streams or stream segments within the <br />Fort Union area of Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. <br />Still in the formative stage, data already gathered have proved <br />useful in developing water supply studies and in helping to determine <br />alternative possibilities for storage site locations and capacities. <br /> <br />Despite progress such as the above, the knowledge of water requirements <br />specific to fish and wildlife needs in the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />is generally lacking. Reliable data and an immediate ability to make <br />valid, defensible recommendations as to the water quantities and <br />regimens needed to support fish and wildlife resources are the <br />exception rather than the rule. <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife Needs - Future requirements for fishing will be <br />influenced by population growth within the region, by increasing <br />demand from the rapidly expanding metropolitan areas outside the <br />region, and by the growing number of visitors from more distant <br /> <br />47 <br />