Laserfiche WebLink
-45- <br />Growth of catchable trout differed between those planted in 1977 <br />and 1976. Those stocked in 1977 showed a large increase in average <br />length between stocking and the first period of capture, while the <br />older fish stocked in 1976 had their largest increment of growth in <br />1977 late in the fishing season. The most likely explanation of the <br />apparently large growth early in the season and slower growth later <br />for the 1977 plants is that anglers were selecting for the larger of <br />the catchables early in the season and returning the smaller ones to <br />the water.. Later in the season, when some growth had actually occurred, <br />the anglers probably were less selective. Therefore, the estimates of <br />growth based on angler caught fish are most likely unreliable. <br />Growth of fingerling rainbow trout was determined from electro- <br />shocked fish, since they were too small to enter the creel. Rainbow <br />trout fingerling stocked in late summer, 1976, exhibited poor growth <br />when captured in October, 1977. These fish were planted as 127-mm <br />(5-in) fingerlings,but after more than a full year in the river, they <br />were only 203 mm (8 in) in the vicinity of the tailrace. Growth was <br />better farther downstream, presumably due to warmer summer water <br />temperatures. After a year, these same fish reached 269 mm (10.6 in) <br />at Little Hole and 312 mm (12.3 in) at Brown's Park. Although growth <br />was greater in Brown's Park, the harvest of these fish was small--far <br />below the catch at Little Hole or at the tailrace. <br />Species composition in the Green River in October as determined <br />from electro-shocking differed from creel caught fish. The largest <br />single component of the population was fingerling rainbow trout planted <br />in 1976 (Table 20). Fish stocked as catchables, the largest component