Laserfiche WebLink
BIOLOGICAL REPORT 90(3) <br />Cut. The removal of vegetation by cutting, thinning, <br />or mowing is a management action to maintain or en- <br />courage growth of desirable plant species. <br />Fertilization (Fert). Fertilization includes the applica- <br />tion of chemical fertilizers, hormones, rooting agents, or <br />commercial growth regulators. For the purposes of this <br />data base, it does not include topsoil, peat, or organic <br />matter; these are entered under Soil. <br />Fire. Prescribed burning may be used as a management <br />tool in wetland creation, restoration, or maintenance. <br />Stabilization (Stabil). Stabilization denotes the use of <br />riprap, wave breaks, or mesh to stabilize streambanks, <br />shorelines, or substrate, or to reduce wave energy or <br />stress. It includes containment structures or materials <br />(e.g., hay bales for containing spoil), concrete revet- <br />ments, bulkheads, gabions, sod, and burlap for the sta- <br />bilization of planted areas. <br />Contaminants (Contam). In some cases, the removal <br />of existing contaminants (or contaminant sources) is <br />part of a wetland creation or restoration project. Water <br />quality improvements and site recovery following a <br />major pollution event (e.g., an oil spill) are included. <br />This key word also denotes the presence at the wetland <br />site of specific contaminants that may affect creation or <br />restoration activities or responses, such as excessive <br />acidity caused by acid precipitation. <br />Model. This key word describes the use of explicit <br />spatial or temporal models (e.g., simulation, optimiza- <br />tion, vegetation mapping) for planning, designing, or <br />evaluating wetland creation or restoration projects. It <br />includes the use of aerial imagery for the analysis of <br />community types. <br />Lab. Lab refers to laboratory or small plot experiments <br />under controlled conditions. It includes the evaluation of <br />the effects of salinity, temperature, water depth, turbidity, <br />and similar conditions on plant growth; demonstration of <br />vegetative culture techniques; analysis of vegetative toler- <br />ance or adaptation to low oxygen supply or ammonia; and <br />determination of the viability, germination, and storage <br />requirements of seeds. <br />According to the wetland creation and restoration <br />projects in the WCR data base, the most frequently <br />employed actions are landforming and planting (Fig. 6). <br />About one-fifth of the data base records deal with <br />dredged materials or gravel-mined sites. Contaminated <br />sites were treated in 263 (24%) of the data base records. <br />Of these, 43% were concerned with the use of wetlands <br />for treatment of wastewater, acid mine waste, urban <br />runoff, coal mine wastewater, and stormwater runoff; <br />several records discussed the use of lime as a treatment <br />for acid conditions and the effects of liming on biotic <br />systems; 8% contained information about heavy metals <br />in wetland systems (including uptake by plants) and <br />subsequent effects; 9% discussed cleanup of oil pollu- <br />tion and its effects on vegetation and coastal systems; <br />and 1.5% discussed pesticides in wetland systems. Of <br />the 263 records, just over one-third (37%) addressed <br />general pollution problems such as phosphorus re- <br />moval, nutrients, eutrophic conditions, salinity, and.ef- <br />fluent in wetland systems. <br />Wetland Type <br />This field describes the subject wetland using National <br />Wetland Inventory codes (Cowardin et al. 1979) in a <br />system-subsystem- Class-subclass format (Table 3). All <br />records contain an entry for wetland type. For general or <br />overview articles or reports, all five systems are listed. The <br />term riparian ("ripar" in the data base) has been added <br />to this field even though it is not part of the system <br />(Cowardin et al. 1979). <br />Of the 1,100 records in the data base, 68% listed <br />freshwater wetland types and 46% listed saltwater types; <br />many contained multiple wetland type listings. <br />Time <br />Time is the maximum period reported for a particu- <br />lar study, rounded off to the nearest year. For example, <br />13 months would be entered as 1 year; 2 years, 7 months <br />would be entered as 3 years. All periods less than 1 year <br />are recorded as 1 year. A "0" entry indicates that no <br />period was specified in the report or article, that the <br />project was in the preliminary or planning stages of <br />development, or that period was not applicable. <br />Of the 1,100 records in the data base, 42% have a zero <br />in the time field, 38% deal with studies of 1-2 years' <br />duration (Group 1), and only 7% contain information <br />from studies that lasted 10 or more years (Group 2; <br />Fig. 7). Groups 1 and 2 had the same proportion of <br />freshwater and saltwater wetlands. Group 2 had a sig- <br />nificantly higher percentage of the key words Erosion, <br />Habitat, and Incidental. Group 2 had twice the percent- <br />age of waterfowl-related studies, a slightly higher per- <br />centage of hydrology studies, and a much higher per- <br />centage (eight times greater) of studies that attempted <br />to evaluate project success than Group 1. Group 1 had <br />a slightly higher percentage of chemical studies, twice <br />as high a percentage of water quality studies, and small <br />percentages for four fields that did not appear at all <br />under Group 2: amphibians, reptiles, human use, and <br />shellfish. The remaining percentages for key words used <br />in both groups were very close. <br />Quantification <br />A "Y" indicates that quantitative results are reported <br />for one or more response variables. An "N" indicates