Laserfiche WebLink
Table 1. Selected morphological features of Rhinichthys osculus <br />thermalis and three nearby populations of R. o_ yarrowi. Mean counts <br />and (standard deviations) are given for lateral line (LL) scales and <br />pectoral fin (PF) rays. Number of individuals and (% of total) are <br />given for fish lacking pharyngeal teeth in at least one secondary row. <br />R. o. thermalis <br />Kendall Warm Spr. <br />R. o_ yarrowi <br />Duck Creek Green River Boulder Cr. <br />Number 50 <br />LL scales 56.0 (4.7)* <br />PF rays 13.3 (0.1) <br />50 <br />64.8 (3.9) <br />13.4 (0.8) <br />No. without 43* 0 <br />teeth in one (86%) <br />secondary row <br />21 <br />68.6 (3.5) <br />14.2 (0.9) <br />0 <br />40 <br />68.0 (4.2) <br />13.3 (0.7) <br />1 <br />(3%) <br />* Significantly different (P<.05) from all R. oo. yarrowi populations <br />from the Green River, but not from Duck Creek or Boulder Creek. These <br />results are in general agreement with the earlier descriptions by Hubbs and <br />Kuhns (1937), except that the present pectoral fin ray counts are higher, <br />and the Kendall Warm Springs dace are not significantly different from <br />speckled dace of all sources. The most important finding is the difference <br />in pharyngeal tooth formulas, which have not previously been studied for <br />Kendall Warm Springs dace. Of 50 specimens examined, 43 (86%) lacked <br />pharyngeal teeth in _at.leas-t one of the secondary.rows, whereas this <br />condition was extremely rare (1 out of a total of 111) in speckled dace from <br />the three sources. Since pharyngeal tooth counts appear not to be thermally <br />labile during early development, this suggests a genetically based <br />morphological differentiation of the Kendall Warm Springs dace. <br />Critical Thermal Maxima <br />There was no significant difference in critical thermal maxima between <br />Kendall Warm Springs dace and speckled dace from Duck Creek, with both <br />acclimated to 27 C (Table 2). For the Kendall dace, this acclimation <br />Table 2. Critical thermal maxima of Rhinichthys osculus thermalis <br />and R_ o_ yarrowi. <br />Source and Mean length <br />Acclimation N in mm Mean CTM <br />Kendall, 27 C 14 43.1 34.8 (a)* <br />Speckled, 27 C 13 48.4 (a) 34.3 (a,b) <br />Speckled, 24 C 7 48.8 (a) 33.9 (b) <br />* Common letter indicates P>.05 (Newman-Keuls) <br />temperature approximates the lower limit that might be experienced at any <br />time in the thermal spring creek. The CTM values for these dace acclimated <br />7