Laserfiche WebLink
PRocEED=s OF THE DESERT FISHES CouNciL, 1995 SYMr oslum <br />populations had 7 to 28% survival (Table 9). The <br />exceptional population, East Sandia Spring, has a <br />survival rate twice that of the next highest (Toe <br />Nail). It also has the highest survival when males <br />are used as predators. East Sandia Spring has the <br />smallest water volume and presumably the lowest <br />population numbers. On my visit, G. geiseri was <br />relatively rare. Conspecific predation by G. geiseri <br />also varies widely but has little correlation with <br />predation on G. af'inis. Variation in predation by <br />G. geiseri on G. affinis young is substantially less <br />than predation by G. affinis when more than 100 <br />young are used: 7% to 28% versus 0% to 69% <br />survival. Presumably the consistency of <br />predation by G. geiseri reflects the recent transfer <br />of the fish from San Marcos. Predation rates of <br />females from East Sandia Spring may reflect <br />evolutionary changes in the 50 years since they <br />were released. <br />Predation by female G. nobilis on G. affinis <br />young again varies significantly. The five samples <br />with sample sizes more than 100 vary between 0 <br />and 14% survival. The small sample sizes have <br />survival rates between those for large samples. <br />Although the range of survival of G. affinis young <br />preyed on by G. nobilis is similar to that of young <br />preyed on by G. geiser, 14% versus 21%, the <br />relative variation is infinity versus three-fold. If <br />few young survive, a high upper figure cannot <br />occur. <br />Birth weight: Average birth weights of <br />Gambusia affinis also vary extensively from less <br />than 10 milligrams to more than 20 milligrams <br />(Table 10). The two New Mexico populations <br />(Lost River and Bitter Lakes #3) have tiny babies <br />(6.0 and 8.0 milligrams). The other small young <br />are Contrabando Canyon, Fairy, Clymer <br />Meadow, Hanks Bull, Patty's Ranch, Big Brown, <br />Hi Island, and Uncertain. Many of the small <br />young are from east Texas, yet other east Texas <br />fish (Village Creek and Egg Nog) have relatively <br />large young. Only Fairy is stenothermal, but <br />commonly G. affinis is absent at stenothermal <br />locations (Hubbs, 1995). All sites have low <br />salinities. <br />The heaviest young are from Heart of the <br />Hills and San Marcos. Fish from Heart of the <br />VOLLTW XXVII - PUBLISHED 1996 <br />Hills (eurythermal) have larger young than those <br />from the nearby Fessenden Spring <br />(stenothermal). The sample location at San <br />Marcos is under the I-35 bridge at a site that is <br />relatively eurythermal for the San Marcos River <br />(Hubbs and Peden, 1969). Again, the variation <br />has little apparent association with geographic or <br />environmental circumstances. <br />Average birth weights of Gambusia geiseri <br />range between 17.1 and 23.3 milligrams. These <br />weights are of the heavier end of those for G. <br />affinis but clearly vary far less. No birth weight <br />data are available for East Sandia Spring. <br />Average birth weights for G. nobilis vary but <br />only three populations have data, so comparisons <br />are not readily available. <br />In general, G. affinis and G. speciosa birth <br />weights are about 16 milligrams, G. geiseri about <br />20 milligrams, Poedlia about 30 milligrams, G. <br />longispinis about 25 milligrams, G. gaigei about 30 <br />milligrams, G. heterochir about 30 milligrams, and <br />G. nobilis about 40 milligrams. <br />Poiedha formosa from San Marcos has heavier <br />young than P. latipinna from San Marcos; sailfin <br />molly young from Comal Springs are heaviest of <br />all. Heart of the Hills sailfin Molly young are <br />about the same weight as Comal amazon Molly. <br />Aransas County P. latipinna young are much <br />lighter than those from the San Marcos River <br />system. <br />Interbrood intervals: Average interbrood <br />intervals for G. affluis females varies between 27 <br />and 41 days (Table 11). The geographically <br />proximate Phantom and Carpenter Hill <br />populations have no overlap (Hubbs, 1996). <br />Again there is no association of the results with <br />environmental or geographic factors. <br />Average interbrood intervals for G. geiseri <br />females is at the long end of the G. affinis range, <br />but the variation is less than for G. affinis (8 days <br />vs. 14). The population extreme in predation rate <br />(East Sandia) has no data on interbrood interval. <br />The interbrood intervals for G. nobilis <br />females are similar, but small sample sizes make <br />any interpretations inconclusive. <br />In general, interbrood intervals are about 35 <br />days for G. afinis, 40 days for G. geiseri, 44 days <br />5