Laserfiche WebLink
DFC PRocEmms - CONTRIBUTED PAPER <br />with G. nobilis, G. heterochir and Poedlia young) <br />with sample sizes of more than 50. In general, G. <br />nobilis, G. heterochir and G. gaigei males ate more <br />young that did males of G. afflnis, G. speciosa, and <br />G. geiseri. Conversely, G. nobilis, G. heterochir and <br />G. gaigei young had a higher survival rate than <br />those of the other three species. <br />Similarly, predation by females followed the <br />same pattern as that reported previously (Table <br />7). Survival of Paodha young exposed to G. afflnis <br />females was lower than that of any Gambusia <br />species. Predation by other species was similar, <br />with most survival of G. a.,f finis young among the <br />lowest. Predation on G. afflnis young by <br />congeneric females was substantially higher than <br />that of males. Congeneric predation on G. afflnis <br />young was higher with G. geiseri, G. nobilis or G. <br />gaigei females than using G. afinis, G. spedosa, or <br />G. heterochir females. In this test, G. geiseri went <br />from low to high and G. heterochir went from high <br />to low in comparison with male predation. Again, <br />survivorship with G. nobilis females was lowest in <br />four of the six tests with sample sizes over 100. <br />The exceptions were G. nobilis and G. gaigei <br />young, where G. nobilis predation was second <br />highest, and G. nobilis with G. heterochir young. <br />Again, G. nobilis, G. heterochir and G. gaigei young <br />had a higher survival rate than those of the other <br />three species. Conspecific predation was highest <br />by G. afflnis females (= cannibalism); G. heterochir <br />and G. gaigei conspecific predation was also quite <br />high. <br />Extensive variation of survivorship occurred <br />when G. afflnis young were exposed to female G. <br />afflnis predation (Table 8). In two tests (Lost <br />River and Big Bend), more than two-thirds of the <br />young survived. In contrast, in seven tests (Bitter <br />#3, Falcon, El Tigre, Fairy, Junction, Middle <br />Creek, and Uncertain), survivorship was below <br />10%. Survivorship with males as predators <br />tended to be similar with the two high survivors <br />having 79 and 88% survivorship and the six with <br />low figures having 85, 76, 66, 73, 64, 77, and <br />68% survivorship. Six of the seven survival <br />percentages with male predators were lower than <br />either of the two with high survivorship with <br />female predators. In two other populations <br />(Pecos and Clear Creek) where the survivorship <br />with female predators had percentages above 50, <br />the comparable male tests had survivorships of 81 <br />and 85%. Similarly, Big Bend and Junction <br />females were tested with G. speciosa and G. geiseri <br />young. In each instance, survivorship with Big <br />Bend females was higher than those with Junction <br />females (61 vs. 18% and 73 vs. 8%). These <br />results remained consistent whether either of two <br />sets of field-caught females or laboratory-raised <br />females (from Big Bend) were used. There is a <br />distinct difference in predation on newborns <br />depending upon the population of adults used. <br />Clearly, the choice of G. a-(finis stocks used for <br />mosquito control would have great influence on <br />average predation on young fishes. It is possible <br />that G. afinis predation on other prey such as <br />mosquitos may vary among populations equally. <br />Such tests by mosquito control agencies are now <br />mandated. <br />The variation of predation by G. afsnis <br />adults does not have a geographic or ecologic <br />pattern. The two New Mexico populations are <br />from the Bitter Lakes National Wildlife Refuge: <br />one is in the low and the other in the high group. <br />Lazy Pond is one kilometer from the Pecos River <br />site. Survivorship with female predators differs <br />by 43% and is significant at beyond the 0.00001 <br />level (xZ = 81). Survivorship based on individual <br />tests is also significant beyond the 0.001 level. <br />Too Much Pond is intermediate geographically <br />and in predation rate. <br />The four high-survival populations (Lost <br />River - saline, stenothermal; Big Bend - low <br />salinity, stenothermal, elevated temperature; <br />Pecos - moderate salinity, eurythermal; Clear <br />Creek - low salinity stenothermal) have little in <br />common. The seven low survival populations <br />(Bitter #3 - saline, eurythermal; Falcon - <br />moderate salinity, eurythermal; El Tigre - saline, <br />eurythermal; Fairy - low salinity, stenothermal; <br />Middle Creek - low salinity, stenothermal; <br />Uncertain - very low salinity, eurythermal) are <br />equally variable. None of these environmental <br />factors are associated with predation rates. <br />Predation by female G. geised on G. afflnis <br />young also varies substantially. All but one of the <br />4