My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8157
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8157
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:24:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8157
Author
Pitlick, J., M. V. Steeter, B. Barkett, R. Cress and M. Franseen.
Title
Geomorphology and Hydrology of the Colorado and Gunnison Rivers and Implications for Habitats Used by Endangered Fishes.
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The bed of the Colorado River is composed of cobble- and gravel-sized particles, except for a short <br />bedrock section in Ruby-Horsethief Canyon known as Black Rocks. The banks and adjacent <br />floodplam are composed of silt and sand covered with thickets of the nonnative tamarisk (Tamarisk <br />chinensis) and russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia), and the native sandbar willow (Salix exigua) <br />and cottonwood (Populus deltoides). In many places in the Grand Valley the banks have been <br />artificially modified by levees and rip-rap. Otherwise the river is "alluvial", meaning it is free to <br />adjust its width and depth. Average gradients of the 15-mile, 18-mile and Ruby-Horsethief <br />Canyon Reaches are 0.00175, 0.0013, and 0.0010, respectively. <br />In the Grand Valley, the Colorado River maintains a "wandering" channel pattern formed by <br />single-thread and multi-thread reaches. In multi-thread reaches the channel can split into a series of <br />islands, side channels and backwaters. These reaches contain more diverse and heterogeneous <br />habitats, which may explain the association between channel complexity and squawfish numbers <br />(Osmundson and Kaeding, 1991). Compared to more incised reaches further downstream, side- <br />channels and backwaters are relatively common in the Grand Valley area. Figure 3 shows an aerial <br />photograph of a prominent island and backwater in the 15-mile reach. At high discharge water <br />enters the side channel from upstream at a point not seen in this photograph, and flows out the <br />mouth. As the discharge drops, water no longer enters the side channel, and instead ponds up into <br />the area downstream, forming a backwater. Other features seen in this photograph include an <br />island with traces of the former channel, an active gravel bar, and portions of two runs. <br /> <br />:.?-? <br />C <br />Also included in this report are descriptions of geomorphic changes and existing conditions along <br />an 85-km reach of the Gunnison River between Delta, CO, and Grand Junction (Fig. 2). The <br />Redlands Diversion dam, located 4 km upstream from the Colorado River confluence, has <br />historically blocked fish from migrating very far up the Gunnison River. However, the recent <br />completion of a fish passage structure at the diversion dam now allows fish to access reaches of the <br />Gunnison River above Grand Junction. The Gunnison River is similar to the Colorado River in <br />many respects, the main difference being that the Gunnison River is more incised than the <br />Colorado, and the channel is less complex overall (see also Milhous, 1998). <br />6 <br />Figure 3. Aerial photograph of a segment of the Colorado River near RM 175.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.