My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6043
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6043
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:19:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6043
Author
Desert Fishes Council (Edwin Pister, e.
Title
A Summary of the Proceeding of the Tenth Annual Symposium.
USFW Year
1978.
USFW - Doc Type
November 16-18, 1978.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
47 <br />IS RADIO-TAGGING A VIABLE TECHNIQUE FOR COLORADO SQUAWFISH? <br />Douglas Selby, BIO/WEST, Inc. <br />A study to determine the spawning requirements of the <br />endangered Colorado Squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) was begun <br />in April 1978 under a contract from the Western Energy and Land <br />Use Team of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project <br />made use of radio tags surgically implanted in the fish, a <br />technique frequently used on salmon, but never on Colorado <br />squawfish and only once previously in the Colorado drainage. <br />Transmitters, receivers, and antennas used were all manufactured <br />by Smith-Root Corporation. The transmitters operated on the <br />40.600 Mhz band. Transmitters were implanted in seven squaw- <br />fish, all of which seemed to be little affected by the surgical <br />procedure. All but one of the seven fish were lost within a <br />week and Never relocated despite intensive searches. The one <br />fish which was tracked moved a total of 89 miles downriver <br />from its point of release in a period of six weeks. He was <br />frequently monitored during this time and all indications <br />were that he was healthy and behaving normally. <br />The problem in locating the other fish apparently was the <br />result of weak transmitters. After thorough searches for the <br />lost fish with negative results, 5 unimplanted transmitters <br />were tested under field conditions and found to be much weaker <br />than advertised. In 2 feet of water, all of the transmitters <br />had ranges of under 100 yards and 2 had ranges of under 100 <br />feet. The transmitters also lost strength with extended <br />operation. <br />Because the transmitters were the obvious cause of the <br />failure of the project, we have recommended a second attempt <br />to determine spawning requirements of squawfish using new <br />pretested transmitters. The successful tracking of one fish <br />for 6 weeks indicates the research potential of radio tagging <br />other native species in the Green River.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.