My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6043
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6043
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:19:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6043
Author
Desert Fishes Council (Edwin Pister, e.
Title
A Summary of the Proceeding of the Tenth Annual Symposium.
USFW Year
1978.
USFW - Doc Type
November 16-18, 1978.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
46 <br />adequate description of the young, a series of 15 detailed drawings <br />was made using a "camera lucida". These drawings document the <br />development of young Colorado squawfish from egg, various larval <br />stages, and juveniles. Morphometrics and meristics were tabulated <br />for each stage. <br />Age and growth were similar for fish captured in the Yampa- <br />Green Rivers and Colorado River at Grand Junction, Colorado, during <br />1974-76. Moreover, there was no significant difference between <br />these fish and those from the upper Green River in 1964-66. <br />Colorado squawfish became mature when individuals reached a <br />size of 428-503 mm in total length and an age of 6-8 years. <br />Spawning requirements were speculated from observations in the <br />field and hatchery, and comparison from related species. Food <br />habits are similarly deduced from observations and the literature. <br />Movement of the Colorado squawfish has been difficult to <br />validate, but seasonal patterns were noted. Two squawfish were <br />tracked briefly with the use of sonic tags. <br />The most common parasite of the Colorado squawfish is the <br />copepod, Lernea sp. Other parasites and diseases include the <br />fungus, Ichthyophthirius sp., the tapeworm Proteocephalus ambloplites, <br />and the protozoa Myxosoma sp. and Myxobolus sp. <br />The decline of the species appears to have resulted from the <br />loss of habitat due to environmental changes in stream flow and <br />biological composition. Dewatering, dams and reservoirs, alteration <br />of stream flow and stream morphology, changes in water quality, and <br />the introduction of exotic species are discussed as being the <br />principal causal factors. <br />While additional studies would be useful to management, the <br />urgency of the situation indicates the need for expeditious efforts <br />at preservation. Artificial propagation is a very important means <br />of buying time and should be vigorously undertaken for all endangered <br />native species. Public education, in the long run, is probably the <br />most important consideration. Further water development projects, <br />especially in the upper Green River and its tributaries, should be <br />considered incompatible with the recovery effort.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.