Laserfiche WebLink
Objectives were addressed as a sequence of tasks, each to be completed before <br />the next could be addressed. <br />1. Obtain tissues of the three study species and their putative hybrids from the study <br />area. <br />2. Extract genomic DNA from samples using a commercially available kit. <br />3. Screen several introns for levels of suitable genetic diversity -that is, determine <br />wihin each intron regions that are not only species-specific and unambiguous, but <br />which reflect no within-species variation. This required that the introns must be <br />evaluated in samples taken from across the Colorado River Basin. <br />4. Develop an efficient methodology that would allow >500 samples to be processed. <br />5. Evaluate samples using these primers and allocate individuals to one of six <br />genotypes: FMS, BHS, WHS, FxW, BxW, or FxB. <br />6. Compare genotypes to phenotypic designation of individual at time of capture (the <br />latter based on coloration, scalation, body shape, and lip morphology). <br />7. Determine spatial distribution of the genotypes by allocating them to study reach. <br />8. Es#imate age of hybrids by evaluating genotypes according to total length (a <br />surrogate for age). <br />Results demonstrated that morphological and genotypic identifications were <br />congruent in over 95% of the individuals. First generation (i.e., F1) hybrids are usually <br />morphologically intermediate between parental species, whereas backcrossed <br />individuals may tend to resemble one of the two parentals. The majority of hybrid <br />individuals in the Yampa River seemingly represented F1s, in that genetic determination <br />of hybridity confirmed morphological diagnosis. However, two hybrids between <br />Flannelmouth and Bluehead suckers were found, and this suggests backcrossing as a <br />possible scenario. These two species are found sympatrically throughout the Colorado <br />River basin, but little or no hybridization has been documented between them to date. <br />Introduction (invasion) of the non-indigenous White Sucker not only has created the <br />poten#ial for hybridization between introduced and indigenous species, but also appears <br />to have potentially compromised the boundary between the two indigenous species. <br />3 <br />