Laserfiche WebLink
in the lower Gunnison River Basin, but the results <br />might indicate that canal and lateral improvements <br />have a greater effect on selenium loads than on salt <br />loads in the Mancos Shale areas of the lower Gunnison <br />River Basin. <br />All of the decreases in selenium and salt loads <br />that might have resulted from the demonstration <br />project probably were not measured at site MA2. The <br />AMB lateral is on a ridge between the Dry Cedar <br />Creek and Montrose Arroyo Basins (fig. 2); therefore, <br />not all ground water resulting from leakage from the <br />AMB lateral would have necessarily discharged to <br />Montrose Arroyo. For the other four laterals that were <br />piped, it was assumed that all subsurface flow <br />resulting from lateral leakage eventually discharged to <br />Montrose Arroyo or tributary drainage ditches <br />upstream from site MA2. Because of a lack of detailed <br />information about the shallow ground-water flow <br />paths in this area, that assumption might not be <br />entirely valid. Because of the extensive pre-project <br />data for site MA2, that site was used as the outflow <br />site instead of a location farther downstream where no <br />sampling had previously been done. Using the load <br />reductions at site MA2 determined by this study and <br />an estimate of the volume of lateral leakage that was <br />not accounted for at site MA2, the BOR has estimated <br />the project's total selenium-load reduction at about <br />210 lb/yr and the total salt-load reduction at about <br />2,500 tons/yr (Michael Baker, Bureau of Reclamation, <br />written commun., 2001). <br />FACTORS AFFECTING SELENIUM AND <br />SALT LOADS <br />The goal of lining a canal or lateral, or removing <br />open-ditch laterals and placing them in PVC pipe as <br />was done in the Montrose Arroyo project, is to reduce <br />or eliminate canal and lateral leakage into shallow <br />ground water. Canal or lateral improvements would <br />have the effect of reducing the volume of shallow <br />ground-water discharge, which should directly reduce <br />selenium and salt loads because load is a function of <br />concentration and discharge. The decreases in the salt <br />loads in the ground-water component for the Montrose <br />Arroyo area (table 5) are assumed to be related to the <br />amount of ground-water recharge that was caused by <br />leakage from the five laterals that were piped. Except <br />for a small decrease at site D2MA (table 1), the <br />salinity concentrations in shallow ground-water <br />discharge (the nonirrigation season, or November <br />through March samples) in the study area did not <br />change significantly from the pre-project to the post- <br />project period; therefore, decreases in ground-water <br />discharge must be the primary reason for decreases in <br />salt loads. However, changes in discharge cannot <br />explain all of the decreases in the selenium loads. As <br />discussed in the previous section and shown in tables 1 <br />and 2, the relative decreases in selenium loads were <br />considerably greater than the decreases in salt loads, <br />which implies that selenium concentrations, at least in <br />some areas, must also have decreased along with <br />decreases in discharge. At three sites, selenium <br />concentrations in the nonirrigation-season samples <br />were lower in the post-project period than in the pre- <br />project period (table 1). At site D2MA, the mean sele- <br />nium concentration in the nonirrigation-season <br />samples decreased from 149 µg/L in the pre-project <br />period to 89 µg/L in the post-project period. In some <br />areas, such as the area drained by ditch D2MA, the <br />decrease in ground-water flow might have affected the <br />geochemical environment in the shallow ground water, <br />which could cause changes in selenium concentra- <br />tions. <br />It was assumed that the decreases in selenium <br />and salt loads described in this report were solely <br />attributed to the lateral project. Home construction <br />was an ongoing activity in the study area, and work at <br />the golf course between sites MA3 and MA2 (fig. 2) <br />also was done during the study period. Because no <br />large tracts of land were removed from irrigation, it <br />does not seem likely that development would have <br />caused lower selenium and salt loads in Montrose <br />Arroyo in 1999-2000. Work at the golf course area <br />proceeded slowly in 1998-99 and the area was not irri- <br />gated. The only potential effect at the golf course in <br />1999 was the filling of a pond in June with water from <br />Montrose Arroyo, which may have leached some sele- <br />nium and salt from salt crusts that were inundated. <br />Limited sprinkler irrigation began on a few of the fair- <br />ways in late summer in 2000, but it is unlikely that the <br />new irrigation had much effect on the post-project <br />loads, which were computed through October 2000. <br />In addition to human activities, there could be <br />other factors that could have affected the results of this <br />study. One factor that raised some concern was the <br />unusually high rainfall in July and August 1999 in the <br />Montrose area. At Montrose, the total precipitation in <br />July and August 1999 was 6.07 inches, which is <br />288 percent above the 1961 to 1990 normal rainfall of <br />12 Effects of Piping Irrigation Laterals on Selenium and Salt Loads, Montrose Arroyo Basin, Western Colorado