Laserfiche WebLink
20,000 <br />18,000 <br />16,000 <br />14,000 <br />z <br />O <br />F <br />z 12,000 <br />Pre-project load <br />Post-project load <br />0 <br />Q <br />0 10,000 <br />J <br />Q <br />Q 8,000 <br />Z <br />Z <br />Q 6,000 <br />4,000 <br />2,000 <br />MA4 D2MA MA3 D1 MA MA2 <br />SITE <br />Figure 5. Comparison of salt loads in Montrose Arroyo Basin before and after the lateral project. <br />Before the demonstration project began, the <br />projected salinity reduction from the lateral project <br />was about 2,300 tons/yr (Michael Baker, Bureau of <br />Reclamation, written commun., 1998). That projection <br />was based on some general canal and lateral seepage <br />rates for the Uncompahgre Valley that were estimated <br />for previous salinity studies (Bureau of Reclamation, <br />1982), the size of the laterals, and the length of time <br />water was in the laterals. The annual ground-water <br />load at site MA2 decreased about 1,800 tons (table 5), <br />which is the part of the salt-load change that is <br />assumed to be directly attributable to eliminating <br />ground-water recharge from laterals that were previ- <br />ously open ditches. At the control site, salt load <br />increased about 180 tons/yr in the post-project period <br />(table 5). If that increase in salt load into the study <br />basin is accounted for, then the salt-load decrease <br />attributable to the lateral piping was about 1,980 <br />tons/yr (1,800 plus 180), which is about 86 percent of <br />the projected salt reduction. <br />Data from the demonstration project provided <br />the NIWQP with information on whether a lateral <br />improvement project has the same effect on selenium <br />loads as it does on salt loads. In remediation planning, <br />some simplifying assumptions previously have been <br />made that use ratios of selenium and salt loads to esti- <br />mate selenium reductions that might occur for salinity- <br />control type projects. Ratios of selenium load to salt <br />load were computed using samples collected in <br />November through March that were assumed to be <br />composed solely of ground-water discharge, and those <br />ratios were used to calculate a selenium reduction <br />based on the estimated salinity reduction for a partic- <br />ular project. For Montrose Arroyo at site MA2, the <br />load ratio was 0.041 (using only pre-demonstration <br />project data), which implies that 0.041 pound of sele- <br />nium is proportional to 1 ton of salt. If the original <br />2,300-ton salt-reduction estimate is used, then the <br />lateral project should have produced about a 94-pound <br />reduction in selenium at site MA2 (2,300 times 0.041). <br />However, the selenium load (in the ground-water <br />component) decreased 178 pounds (table 4) at site <br />MA2, almost double what was predicted using the <br />load ratio. The ratio for the selenium and salt load <br />reductions measured for this study (tables 4 and 5) is <br />about 0.10 (178 pounds of selenium divided by <br />1,800 tons of salt). It is not known how applicable the <br />results of the demonstration project are to other areas <br />EFFECTS OF PROJECT ON SELENIUM AND SALT LOADS 11