My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7734
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7734
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:12:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7734
Author
Buth, D. G., Thomas R. Haglund and Sabrina Drill.
Title
Preliminary Report on Razorback Suckers from Etter Pond.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Los Angeles, CA.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
happens to predominate in Etter Pond and is found in very low <br />frequency in other razorback populations (Figure 1). If Ck-A was <br />the only locus to suggest hybridization, we would be concerned <br />about this alternate explanation. However, "flannelmouth" <br />alleles at Ada-A2, mIcdh-A, and mMdh-A1 were also identified <br />(albeit at low frequency) in the Etter Pond sample raising <br />coincidence beyond reasonable expectations. The assymmetry of <br />introgression at the marker loci is especially interesting, but <br />explanations (e.g. selective differences) would be speculative at <br />this time. <br />Status of Etter Pond razorbacks.- The razorbacks inhabiting <br />Etter Pond represent at least a second generation beyond an <br />original hybridization event. Tom Dowling (pers. comm.) examined <br />these same 13 original razorbacks from Etter Pond and found only <br />"razorback mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)." Because of the maternal <br />inheritance of mtDNA, one can conclude that the original <br />hybridization involved female razorback(s) and male <br />flannelmouth(s). A subsequent backcross of F1 x flannelmouth <br />should have yielded more flannelmouth alleles at Ada-A2, mIcdh-A, <br />and mMdh-Al than found (Table 1). A subsequent backcross of F1 x <br />razorback should have produced many individuals homozygous for <br />the razorback Ck-A allele (not found; Table 1). The most <br />parsimonious explanation of the data in Table 1 would be that <br />these specimens are the result of F2 x F2 pairings in which the <br />creatine kinase expression of the parents was always RF <br />(heterozygous) x FF ("flannelmouth" homozygote), which would <br />yield only RF and FF offspring in equal numbers (exactly what is <br />found in Table 1: 27 RF and 28 FF). These almost-equal numbers <br />of Ck-A RF and FF are compatible with the result of a cross of a <br />single F2 male and a single F2 female (or relatively few <br />individuals among which one sex was all RF and the other all FF). <br />We would have to speculate that a few more than two parents <br />contributed to the current generation and that heterozygous <br />conditions existed in perhaps only a single parent per diagnostic <br />locus to explain the residual heterozygosity at the other <br />diagnostic loci. In any case, the entire Etter Pond population <br />is introgressed with alleles from hybridization with flannelmouth <br />suckers. We strongly recommend that all Etter Pond specimens, <br />and hatchery progeny, be destroyed to prevent the perpetuation <br />and enhancement of genomic pollution of the greater razorback <br />population. <br />Other Colorado sources of razorback breeding stock.- Although <br />based on only four specimens, the Highline Lake population <br />exhibits no evidence of hybridization (Table 2). We raise the <br />question of the exact origin of the three 1993 "Colorado River" <br />specimens. If they indeed came from the Colorado River proper, <br />then this population is also introgressed and should not be <br />tapped for breeding stock. If, on the other hand, these <br />specimens came from impoundments near the river and not the river <br />proper (as in 1991; specimen RSB-008 Table 2), it may be that the <br />impoundments are conducive to interbreeding and that the Colorado <br />River population is not introgressed (even so, such a conclusion <br />is based on only three 1988 specimens). <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.