My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7848
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7848
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:10:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7848
Author
Burdick, B. D.
Title
Minimum Flow Recommendation For Passage Of Colorado Squawfish And Razorback Sucker In The 2.3-Mile Reach Of The Lower Gunnison River
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Redlands Diversion Dam To The Colorado River Confluence.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
prominent thalweg across this transect which was a slow run across a riffle. <br />Transect No. 14 (Appendix; Figure G.9.) <br />This transect was located at RM 1.8, 1.2 miles downstream of the Redlands <br />Diversion Dam. This transect extended approximately 420 feet across the primary <br />channel at a 60° angle to the channel . The mean and maximum water depth was 0.6- <br />and 1.2 feet, respectively, when the flow was 276 cfs. There was a slight <br />thalweg near river left (west bank). Twenty-six of the 179 water depth <br />observations (15X) exceeded 1 foot (Appendix; Table G.4.). Most of the habitat <br />at this transect could be classified as a riffle; the thalweg portion being a <br />slow run. <br />Transect No. 19A (Appendix; Figure G.10.) <br />This transect was located at RM 1.4, 1.6 miles downstream of the Redlands <br />Diversion Dam, approximately 600 feet downstream of the former Black Bridge. The <br />width of the wetted channel was 190 feet and the transect was perpendicular to <br />the primary channel. The mean and maximum water depth was 0.7 and 1.1 feet, <br />respectively, when the flow was 264 cfs and only 5% of the wetted channel width <br />exceeded 1 foot (Appendix; Table G.4.). The habitat at this transect could be <br />classified as a slow run. There was not a prominent thalweg across this <br />transect. <br />Transect No. 1961 & 19B2 (Appendix; Figures G.11. and G.12.) <br />This transect was located immediately downstream of Transect 19A at RM 1.4. <br />Transects were conducted at this site on two different dates, 2 and 3 August. <br />On both days, the transect extended 200 feet across the primary channel at a 45° <br />angle. Flows on both days were similar--268 and 266 cfs; hence the mean and <br />maximum water depth on both days were identical, 0.5 and 1.1 feet, respectively. <br />However, the number of water depths that exceeded 1 foot were greater on 3 August <br />(10 versus 4). The habitat at this transect at this flow was classified as a <br />slow run/riffle. <br />Transect No. 20 (Appendix; Figure G.13.) <br />This transect was located at RM 1.4, immediately downstream of Transect 19B. <br />This transect extended approximately 184 feet across the primary channel at a 45° <br />angle. The mean and maximum water depth was 0.6 and 1.0 feet, respectively, when <br />the flow was 266 cfs. No water depth exceeded 1 foot across this transect during <br />this flow. The habitat at this transect was a slow run across a riffle. <br />Summary of Transect Data <br />Three of the seven FWS transects, 9, 19, and 20, within the 2.3-mile reach <br />had critically shallow water depths less than 300 cfs. The most critical periods <br />were during late-July and early-August 1994 when flows were 250-276 cfs. At <br />these flows, the actual measured mean and maximum depth at transect 9 and 19 was <br />0.4 and 0.8 and 0.5 and 1.1 feet, respectively (Appendix; Table G.4.). At 300 <br />cfs, the predicted mean and maximum depth at transect 9 and 19 was 0.5 and 1.2 <br />25
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.