My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7834
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7834
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:09:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7834
Author
Burdick, B. D. a. R. B. B.
Title
Experimental Stocking Of Adult Razorback Sucker In The Upper Colorado And Gunnison Rivers.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
100 <br />80 <br />W <br />a 60 <br />H <br />Z <br />V <br />W 40 <br />CL <br />20 <br />0 <br />RADIOTELEMETRY HABITAT USE <br />Colorado River <br />Razorback sucker <br />N=12 fish <br />n=57 observations <br />Legend <br />MC=main channel <br />BA=backwater <br />EP=eddy/pool <br />SC=side channel <br />34 TS=tributary/stream <br />EM=embayment <br />SH=shoreline <br />PO=pool <br />GP=gravel pit <br />10 <br />6 <br />2 , 2 2 <br />MC BA EP SC EM PO GP <br />HABITAT TYPE <br />TS SH <br />Figure 7. Cumulative frequency of habitat use for 12 radiotagged <br />razorback sucker in the Upper Colorado River, April-August <br />1994 and March-October 1995. The value immediately above the <br />bars indicates the cumulative number of observations per <br />habitat type for all 12 fish. Refer to Appendix; Table B.1. <br />for frequency of habitat used per fish. <br />Habitats used by these fish did not necessarily indicate habitat preference. <br />More meaningful data would be to determine habitat preferred by razorback sucker. <br />To determine if razorback sucker prefer particular habitat types, usage would <br />have to be compared with habitat availability. However, habitat availability was <br />not determined or calculated in the immediate vicinity when a fish was contacted. <br />In this study, the priority was to determine 1) general fish movement and <br />dispersal 2) survivorship following stocking, and 3) general habitat use. <br />20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.