Laserfiche WebLink
side channels, embayments, pools, and gravel-pit ponds (Figure 7). Habitat-use <br />observations were combined for all fish and for the 5- and 8-month period in 1994 <br />(April-August) and 1995 (March-October), respectively. The three habitats <br />selected most by radiotagged razorback sucker were main channel (59.6X), <br />backwater (17.5X), and eddy/pool (10.5X). Fish used side channels, pools, and <br />gravel-pit ponds each 3.5% of the time. Eleven of the 12 fish used the main <br />channel habitat, six used backwaters, four used eddy/pools, and two each used <br />side channel and pools. Habitat used by each of these 12 fish is provided in <br />Appendix; Table B.1. <br />Because the movement of the three fish (.010, .050, and .241 Mhz) believed <br />to be alive at the termination of the study was different than other fish <br />stocked, the habitat used by the three fish was contrasted to the other razorback <br />sucker. The three fish believed to be alive at the termination of the study used <br />main channel habitats less than the other fish (40% versus 68%) but used <br />eddy/pools more (35% versus 0%; Table 3). <br />Table 3. Comparison of habitat use by three razorback sucker in the Upper <br />Colorado River that were confirmed alive at the termination of the <br />study versus nine other razorback sucker stocked in the Upper Colorado <br />River. <br />Three Razorback Sucker Nine Razorback Sucker <br />(0.10, .050, .241 Mhz) (.070, .090, .260, .360, .420 <br />.541, .580, .620, 720 Mhz) <br />No. of No. of <br />Main Channel 8 4U Lb 08 <br />Eddy/Pool 7 35 0 0 <br />Side Channel 1 5 1 3 <br />Embayment 0 0 1 3 <br />Pool 2 10 0 0 <br />Backwater 2 10 8 21 <br />Gravel Pit 0 0 2 5 <br />Gunnison River <br />One-hundred nine habitat observations were obtained from 15 different fish. <br />Three of the nine habitat types used more frequently were main channel (40.4X), <br />backwaters (25.7X), and eddy/pools (19.3X). Other habitats used less frequently <br />were side channels (5.5X), tributary streams (3.7X), embayments and shorelines <br />(each 1.8X), and pools and isolated pools (each 0.9%; Figure 8). <br />Thirteen of the 15 razorback sucker used the main channel habitat, 10 used <br />backwaters, 9 used eddy/pools, 6 used side channels, and 2 fish occupied <br />Roubideau Creek, a tributary stream. Habitat used by each of these 15 fish is <br />provided in Appendix; Table B.2. <br />19