My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9413
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:07:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9413
Author
Osmundson, D. B.
Title
Flow Regimes for Restoration and Maintenance of Sufficient Habitat to Recover Endangered Razorback Sucker and Colorado Pikeminnow in the Upper Colorado River.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Trammel and Chart (1999b) concluded that scour-channel backwaters comprised the <br />majority of backwater area and are preferred by YOY Colorado pikeminnow. The authors <br />suggested this preference may be due to the greater depth and persistence of this backwater <br />type compared to the more numerous, smaller backwaters created by migrating sand waves. <br />High flows do not increase backwater number or area in the year they occur, but they are <br />critical for the continued persistence of backwaters of sufficient size and quality. Periodic <br />large floods are necessary to rebuild bar topography and channel relief. Moderate peaks in <br />years following large floods rearrange the deposits which later become mid-channel bars at <br />base flow (Rakowski and Schmidt 1997). Because bar topography changes annually, there <br />is no single discharge that maximizes backwater number or area during base flows; the base <br />flow that maximizes backwater availability in fall depends on antecedent flows. However, <br />McAda (2001) reported that backwater number and area in the lower Colorado River <br />declines when base flows exceed 4,000 cfs. <br />It is difficult to arrive at specific base flows in the Palisade-to-Rifle reach that will <br />provide optimum flows for nursery habitat downstream near Moab. Clearly, very high <br />spring flows are periodically needed to rebuild eroded sand bars in the lower river and high <br />base flows should be avoided so that flows near Moab do not exceed 4,000 cfs. <br />Flooded Bottomlands for Razorback Sucker <br />Spring flows high enough to inundate bottomlands adjacent to the river channel are <br />periodically needed to benefit razorback sucker reproduction and survival of young <br />(Wydoski and Wick 1998). Larval razorback suckers initially feed on diatoms, rotifers, <br />algae, and detritus (Bestgen 1990, Papoulias and Minckley 1992); soon afterward, they <br />select larger zooplankton, primarily cladocerans and copepods (Marsh and Langhorst <br />1988). To survive the critical first phase of life (the transition from endogenous to <br />exogenous nutrition), razorback sucker larvae require 30-60 food organisms per day <br />(Papoulias and Minckley 1992). Such zooplankton densities were found in floodplain <br />habitats of the Green River, rarely found in backwaters, and never found in the main channel <br />of upper basin rivers (Cooper and Severn 1994a, 1994b, 1994c, 1994d, Grabowski and <br />26
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.