Laserfiche WebLink
Biological Implications <br />General <br />The primary impetus for physical, chemical and biological research in the upper Colorado <br />River basin is concern about the recovery of native fish species. Ultimately, it must be <br />determined what the critical food, water and habitat requirements are for individual species of <br />concern. <br />Algae and invertebrates in the streambed, or benthos, provide the food base for native fish. <br />The structure of the benthic community of streams and rivers is determined by the interaction <br />of a number of critical factors, both biotic and abiotic. Biotic factors include predation and <br />competition. Abiotic factors include substrate characteristics and water quality <br />characteristics, e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, light penetration, etc. In some <br />systems, an additional abiotic factor, disturbance, can strongly influence the benthic <br />community by preventing it from maturing to the point where the structure is largely <br />determined by the biotic factors of competition and predation. In systems where disturbance <br />is frequently repeated, the community may be in a constant state of dynamic equilibrium, <br />where change is the norm, and a climax community is rarely reached. Such is likely the case <br />in gravel-bed rivers, where disturbance occurs on a near-annual basis when flood flows <br />mobilize the benthos. <br />The following two sections discuss the biological implications of substrate particle size and <br />embeddedness and the potential importance of disturbance. <br />Embeddedness and Substrate Particle i <br />From a biological standpoint, relative DTE, measured in number of `free rocks', may be more <br />relevant than total DTE, given that many small rocks should provide more surface area for <br />invertebrates to exploit than a few large rocks. Bjornn et al. (1977) experimentally <br />introduced fine sediment into laboratory streams and found that the degree of embeddedness <br />had an important influence on insect abundance. When starting with a zero to one-third <br />embeddedness (analogous to a 0.67-1.0 relative DTE), insect abundance declined by about <br />50% when embeddedness exceeded one-third (< 0.67 relative DTE). When one streambed <br />plot was later cleaned of fine sediment, mayflies and stoneflies increased by up to eightfold. <br />In rapidly flowing water all but the coarse substrate particles are washed away, resulting in an <br />invertebrate fauna adapted for attachment, clinging or avoidance of the current. Cummins <br />and Lauff (1969) concluded that although current, temperature or concentration of a <br />chemical factor may limit the general ranges of habitat tolerance (macrodistribution) in <br />aquatic insects, it was substrate particle size or food supply that probably exerted the primary <br />microdistributional influences. <br />Rabeni and N inshall (1977) studied the microdistribution of stream insects in relation to <br />current velocity, substratum particle size, silt, and detritus utilizing substratum-filled trays in <br />field experiments. They found 31% more organisms occurred in riffles than in pools and that <br />26