My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7145
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7145
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:06:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7145
Author
Inslee, T. D.
Title
Spawning of Razorback Suckers
USFW Year
1981.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table II), and the date of the yearly peak flow is thus determined by the <br />date of the high flow in the 15-mile reach. Flows at the top of the 15- <br />mile reach comprise an average of 37.2% in April, 54.98 in May, and 65.48 <br />in June of flows at the USGS gage near the Colorado/Utah State line (Table <br />5). When the return flows from upstream irrigation removal are added back <br />throughout the length of the Grand Valley, flows from the upper Colorado <br />drainage are calculated to comprise 53.38, 63.38, and 74.3% of State line <br />flows during April, May, and June, respectively. During historic times, <br />before major upstream dams and transmountain diversions were in place, the <br />relative contributions of the two rivers were not substantially different <br />from their relative contributions today (Table 5 and Fig. 9). To provide <br />peak flows of 30,000 to 40,000 cfs at the State line, the flow of the <br />Colorado River near Cameo, including the contribution of Plateau Creek <br />just downstream, needs to be approximately 21,000 to 26,000 cfs and ap- <br />proximately 19,500 to 25,000 cfs in the upper end of the 15-mile reach <br />(Table 6). However, this assumes that the average input from the Gunnison <br />River and the amount removed for and returned from local irrigation remain <br />at current levels. To maintain the status quo, these flows will have to <br />occur at a frequency averaging one in four years. To improve Colorado <br />squawfish reproduction downstream, and ultimately increase the chances for <br />species recovery, the frequency of peak flows of this magnitude will need <br />to be increased. <br />Thus, we believe that high spring flows from the Colorado River drainage <br />upstream from the mouth of the Gunnison River are necessary to create and <br />maintain habitat for adult Colorado squawfish both within the 15-mile <br />reach and in the important reaches of the Colorado River downstream. These <br />high flows not only create the diversity of habitat seemingly required by <br />33
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.