Laserfiche WebLink
to dislodge tamarisk seedlings that had become established during the <br />previous two low-water years or flush large backwaters of accumulated <br />sediments (Osmundson, personal observation). Establishment of tamarisk is <br />viewed as a threat to habitat complexity because of its stabilizing effect <br />on banks, which in turn leads to further channelization of the bed and <br />narrowing of the stream channel (Graf 1978, Valdez 1990, U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service 1990). Flushing flows of some magnitude higher than <br />11,000 cfs, or perhaps of a longer duration, are evidently needed. At <br />present, we do not know the precise magnitude or duration of flushing <br />flows necessary that will prevent channelization and promote habitat <br />heterogeneity. Such studies are needed. However, it is clear that in the <br />upper Colorado River where sediment loads are high, flushing flows of <br />adequate magnitude and duration are needed to occur at a greater frequency <br />than that observed during recent years. <br />Spring Flow Effects on Young Fishes <br />Background <br />High spring flows also appear to be important in enhancing reproductive <br />success and/or survival of young of some native species, including Colora- <br />do squawfish. Haynes et al. (1984) sampled larval Colorado squawfish in <br />the upper Colorado River (Loma to the Colorado/Utah State line) during <br />1979-1981 and in the Yampa River during 1980-1981. In the Colorado River, <br />catch rates of larval Colorado squawfish were highest in 1979 and 1980, <br />years in which State-line peak flows were approximately 35,000 and 30,000 <br />cfs, respectively. In both rivers, catch rates were lowest in 1981, a year <br />of low spring flows.. In the Colorado River, only one larvae was collected <br />in 1981 despite the highest sampling effort of the three years. Discharge <br />on the highest flow day of 1981 averaged 11,200 cfs at the Colorado/Utah <br />10