Laserfiche WebLink
Thus we view high spring flows as important in shaping and maintaining the <br />river bed, resulting in a complex of braided channels important to adult <br />squawfish; with descending flow, some of these side channels are cut off <br />at their upstream end and backwaters are formed at the mouth, resulting in <br />important potential nursery habitat for young squawfish. In addition, <br />backwaters may provide refugia for young squawfish so they are not en- <br />trained in main channel currents and transported long distances down- <br />stream. <br />When storage projects are located in the headwaters above major sources of <br />sediment, such as in the upper Colorado River, they have little effect on <br />reducing sediment recruitment to downstream segments. Coupled with a <br />reduced flow regime, sediment input rates are likely to exceed transport <br />rates and sediment depositional problems (aggradation) are likely to occur <br />with time (Reiser et al. 1989). Vegetation encroaches on stream channels <br />during periods of low flow, thereby stabilizing areas of deposition <br />(Maddock 1978). When such situations persist over a period of years, <br />riparian encroachment into the active channel can occur, resulting in a <br />change in channel size and shape. Flushing flows for channel maintenance <br />are needed when vegetation encroachment begins to affect flow transport <br />capacity and channel shape thus predisposing the reach to further en- <br />croachment and sedimentation (Reiser et al. 1989). <br />Peak flows in the 15-mile reach in 1988 and 1989 were only 10,796 and <br />6,641 cfs, respectively. During these years, many pools and mouths of <br />backwaters in the Grand Valley silted in and tamarisk and willow seedlings <br />became established on new sand/silt bars. During 1990, maximum daily peak <br />flow was estimated at 9,469 cfs in the 15-mile reach and was insufficient <br />9