My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7145
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7145
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:06:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7145
Author
Inslee, T. D.
Title
Spawning of Razorback Suckers
USFW Year
1981.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Thus we view high spring flows as important in shaping and maintaining the <br />river bed, resulting in a complex of braided channels important to adult <br />squawfish; with descending flow, some of these side channels are cut off <br />at their upstream end and backwaters are formed at the mouth, resulting in <br />important potential nursery habitat for young squawfish. In addition, <br />backwaters may provide refugia for young squawfish so they are not en- <br />trained in main channel currents and transported long distances down- <br />stream. <br />When storage projects are located in the headwaters above major sources of <br />sediment, such as in the upper Colorado River, they have little effect on <br />reducing sediment recruitment to downstream segments. Coupled with a <br />reduced flow regime, sediment input rates are likely to exceed transport <br />rates and sediment depositional problems (aggradation) are likely to occur <br />with time (Reiser et al. 1989). Vegetation encroaches on stream channels <br />during periods of low flow, thereby stabilizing areas of deposition <br />(Maddock 1978). When such situations persist over a period of years, <br />riparian encroachment into the active channel can occur, resulting in a <br />change in channel size and shape. Flushing flows for channel maintenance <br />are needed when vegetation encroachment begins to affect flow transport <br />capacity and channel shape thus predisposing the reach to further en- <br />croachment and sedimentation (Reiser et al. 1989). <br />Peak flows in the 15-mile reach in 1988 and 1989 were only 10,796 and <br />6,641 cfs, respectively. During these years, many pools and mouths of <br />backwaters in the Grand Valley silted in and tamarisk and willow seedlings <br />became established on new sand/silt bars. During 1990, maximum daily peak <br />flow was estimated at 9,469 cfs in the 15-mile reach and was insufficient <br />9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.