Laserfiche WebLink
55 <br />The sediment supply for the model was the 1983 measured sediment <br />data at Mathers Hole. Two cross sections downstream were surveyed as <br />intermediate cross sections to the modeled area. Eight cross sections <br />were monitored at the cobble bar area at river mile 16.5. Five of the <br />eight were surveyed over the cobble riffle and three through the pool <br />upstream (see Figure 3). In all, approximately one and one eighth miles <br />of the four mile cobble reach were modeled. The model reach contained 3 <br />riffles and 3 pools. The last riffle-pool sequence was modeled in its <br />entirety. This sequence represents the complete range of hydraulic and <br />sediment transport conditions and processes that are found in the four <br />mile reach. <br />The model is constructed of a series of components, which have been <br />universally applied in engineering predictions of sediment transport. <br />It preserves continuity by keeping a budget of the incoming sediment <br />supply, the transport capacity and sediment deposition or scour in each <br />individual reach. <br />The routing model is designed for determining channel aggradation <br />and degradation in a river system. The river is divided into a series <br />of computational reaches with similar hydraulic and geomorphic <br />characteristics. Hydraulic conditions for each reach are calculated <br />using the well-known and widely applied U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br />HEC-2 water surface profile computer program. The computed hydraulic <br />conditions are then used to calculate sediment transport capacity for <br />each subreach in the downstream direction. The sediment transport <br />capacity is compared with the sediment supply from the previous subreach <br />and the resulting aggradation or degradation is uniformly distributed <br />both laterally and longitudinally in the reach. <br />The input discharge hydrograph is discretized into a series of time <br />steps; each step represents a period of steady discharge. The sediment <br />supply to the first cross section is similarly discretized for the same <br />time steps. A new value for water and sediment discharge can be inputed <br />with each time step to simulate the gradually varied flow condition. A <br />description of the sediment transport processes, model assumptions and <br />model calibration are presented in Appendix B. <br />The results of the mathematical model study was a minimum streamflow <br />hydrograph based on the predicted aggradation/degradation response to <br />reduced water discharge. The minimum streamflow hydrograph was <br />contructed to insure that a relatively sand free cobble bed is <br />maintained in the modeled reach during the period from mid-July through <br />mid-August. This criteria should be met on an annual basis for any <br />given sediment supply scenario. The sediment supply to the upstream <br />cross section, represented by a sediment input hydrograph, governs the <br />resultant shape and timing of the simulated minimum streamflow <br />hydrograph. Numerous sediment supply scenarios and water discharge <br />hydrographs were tested utilizing both sediment-water discharge <br />regression relationships and sediment hydrographs. In the final <br />analysis the simulated hydrograph was based on the 1983 measured <br />sediment load at Mathers Hole.