Laserfiche WebLink
54 <br />shear stresses large enough for incipient motion of the median cobble <br />size particle are necessary to scour the sand level to greater depths. <br />In the field, the sand level was approximately one-half to one median <br />cobble diameter below the surface of the cobbles. <br />Dynamic Processes of Sand Transport over Cobble Substrate <br />The following discussion applies the results and observations from <br />the physical model study to the field conditions. The effects of <br />deposition of excessive amounts sands and fine material on the cobble <br />substrate can be severe, limiting the aquatic insect population, <br />reducing the capacity for spawning, and reducing the channel carrying <br />capacity. The processes which insure a sand free cobble substrate are <br />closely linked to a seasonal hydrograph shape and duration. The cobble <br />bars have evolved upstream of wide bends to produce relatively short <br />riffles of steep slope and high velocities that prohibit sand deposi- <br />tion. The pools upstream of the riffles have a sand substrate whose bed <br />elevation fluctuates to seek equilibrium levels. The pool bed will <br />scour at peak flows and will aggrade at low flow. There is evidence to <br />suggest that the sand will migrate from a riffle to a pool during the <br />base flow period (Rosgen, 1982). <br />On the rising limb of the hydrograph, sands are deposited in the <br />interstices. These sands are interchanged between the bed and the <br />suspended zone for discharges less than bankfull. Depending on the <br />supply-capacity relationship, either deposition or scour could be <br />occurring. Coarser sand sizes are transported as bedload in tortuous <br />paths around the cobbles. When the cobbles move, the sand, of course, <br />is washed from the interstices and may completely be removed from around <br />the cobbles. At that point, sand will be released only when one of the <br />armor particles is moved. Rearrangement of the cobbles will result in <br />more stability of the armor layer. On the falling limb, the armor layer <br />becomes a trap for sands until finally, the sand reservoir is again <br />filled. Without cobble movement, sand will be scoured only to a depth <br />of one-half to one median cobble diameter below the cobble bed surface. <br />It was observed that at peak flows, portions of the cobble <br />substrate were covered with sand to depths of one foot or more. These <br />channel areas, outside the thalweg, are subjected to deposition as the <br />sediment supply approaches transport capacity. Discharges of one-half <br />the incipient motion of the armor layer will be capable of extracting <br />sands and fines from the cobble substrate (Milhous, 1982). This corres- <br />ponds to roughly the effective discharge for the Yampa River. <br />Mathematical Model Stud <br />A quasi-steady water and sediment routing mathematical model wac- <br />developed to simulate sediment transport in the cobble reach of the <br />Yampa River. The field investigation of hydraulics and sediment <br />transport was designed for the purpose of mathematically modeling a <br />portion of the river to predict the river's response to various <br />scenarios of simulated water and sediment discharge. Steepness <br />precludes the necessity of modeling sediment transport in the first <br />twenty miles of the canyon. A portion of the riffle-pool, cobble bar <br />reach from river mile 16.5 to 20.5 was delineated for modeling.