My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9612
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9612
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:02:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9612
Author
N.A.
Title
Flaming Gorge Flow Recommendation Investigation FG-1 Technical Integration and Final Report - Hydrology and Physical Science Chapter - Draft.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DRAFT February25, 1998 <br />• <br />river kilometers. Five of the ten sites were located on Bureau of Land Management <br />(BLM) sites and the other five sites were located on the Ouray National Wildlife Refuge <br />(ONWR). The objectives of the study were to determine: 1) The discharge at which each <br />of the bottomlands flood; 2) Areas of inundation for each bottomland for different flood <br />levels; and 3) Levee removal (natural or artificial) strategies in order to flood the <br />bottomlands at a more historical frequency and magnitude. <br />The BLM sites are characterized by high, heavily vegetated natural levees. The BLM <br />bottomland sites partially fill and drain on an annual basis through seepage connections as <br />the river rises during the runoff season. Restoration alternatives have been proposed for <br />these sites to allow flooding to occur at 13,000 ft3/s, a discharge with a return period of <br />1.5-years based on post-1963 hydrology. About 57 hectares of flooded bottomland <br />habitat would be available at these sites. <br />For the ONWR bottomland sites, more acreage is available for flooding than at the BLM <br />sites. About 258 hectares could be flooded at 13,000 ft3/s with selective levee removal. <br />Fish passage to these bottomlands would be available at close to assumed historic <br />frequency and duration. <br />• Grams, P.E., and J.C. Schmidt. 1996. Geomorphology of the Green River in the eastern <br />Uinta Mountains, Colorado and Utah. In: Varieties of Fluvial Form, A.J. Miller (ed.). John <br />Wiley and Sons, New York. (In press) <br />Longitudinal profile, channel cross-section geometry, and depositional pattens of the <br />Green River in its course through the eastern Uinta Mountains are each strongly <br />influenced by river-level geology and tributary sediment delivery processes. We surveyed <br />channel cross-sections at 1-km intervals, mapped surficial geology, and measured size and <br />characteristics of bed material in order to evaluate the geomorphic organization of the 70 <br />Ian study reach. Canyon reaches that are of high gradient and narrow channel geometry <br />are correlated with the most resistant iithologies exposed at river level and the most <br />frequent occurrences of tributary debris fans. Meandering reaches that are characterized <br />by low gradient and wide channel geometry are correlated with river-level lithology that is <br />of moderate to low resistance and very low debris fan frequency. The channel is in <br />contact with bedrock or talus along only 42 percent of the bank length in canyon reaches <br />and there is an alluvial fill of at least 12 m that separates the channel bed from bedrock at <br />3 borehole sites. Thus the influence of lithology on channel form is indirect. The <br />influence of lithology primarily operates through the presence of resistant boulders in <br />debris fans that are delivered by debris flow from steep tributaries Shear stress estimates <br />indicate that bed material size and channel form and steepness are in approximate <br />adjustment for discharges of about the 10-yr recurrence flood as determined for <br />• unregulated streamflow. Downstream transport of gravel is limited; gravel-bar lithology <br />21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.