My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9612
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9612
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:02:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9612
Author
N.A.
Title
Flaming Gorge Flow Recommendation Investigation FG-1 Technical Integration and Final Report - Hydrology and Physical Science Chapter - Draft.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• DRAFT February25, 1998 <br />three years on the average and would provide flooding frequency and duration similar to <br />pre-1963 conditions. The maximum possible area of inundation is about 4,050 hectares, <br />which currently occurs for a discharge over 37,000 ft3/s (100-year event). <br />In Canyonlands, flooding of the side canyon backwater areas initiates at a discharge of <br />approximately 7,000 f:3/s. And increases linearly up to bankfull discharge, 39,000 ft3/s. <br />It was estimated that 200 hectares of floodplain became inundated between 30,000 <br />(5-year) and 53,000 ft3/s (100-year). <br />Restoration of flooded bottomlands habitat at Ouray could be accomplished through a <br />combination of increased water surface elevations, prolonged peak flow duration, lower <br />bank or levee heights and constructed inlets. Construction activities to restore flooding <br />must address channel stability issues, potential increase in flood levels, sediment <br />deposition, and potential changes in channel morphology. <br />In Canyonlands, enhancing the flooding of side canyon backwater areas can be <br />accomplished only through flow augmentation. It is not practical to restore or enhance <br />flooding through physical alteration of the backwater habitat areas. Because of the <br />• magnitude of the required overbank flow, flow augmentation is probably impractical as <br />well. <br />FLO Engineering, Inc. 1997(a). 1996 Green River Discharge Monitoring. Habitat <br />Restoration Program, Recovery Program Project #72. FLO Engineering, Inc., <br />Breckenridge, Colorado. 18p. <br />The results available for the 1996 monitoring of the Green River runoff indicate several <br />key findings regarding flow routing. First, for flows in the range of 12,000 ft3/s to 18,000 <br />W/s, the travel time from Jensen to Stillwater Canyon is approximately 85 hours and the <br />mean velocity is about 1.1 m/s. Secondly, for flows from 5,000 ft3/s to 12,000 ft3/s, the <br />travel time between the same two points is approximately 100 hours with a mean velocity <br />of 0.9 m/s. Third, downstream from Jensen, the Green River is a gaining river, that is, <br />average discharge increases with distance downstream from Jensen. Fourth, the sharp <br />peak discharge at Jensen flattens and increases in duration with the inflows from the White <br />and Duchesne Rivers. <br />FLO Engineering, Inc. 1997(b). Green River Floodplain Habitat Restoration Investigation - <br />Bureau of Land Management Sites and Ouray National Wildlife Sites near Vernal, Utah. <br />FLO Engineering, Inc., Breckenridge, Colorado. 62p. <br />Ten Green River study reaches containing bottomlands were selected for floodability <br />assessment. The ten bottomland areas were located near Vernal, Utah, stretching over 40 <br />20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.