My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7273
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7273
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:51:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7273
Author
Prewitt, C. G., E. J. Wick and D. E. Snyder.
Title
Population and Habitat Monitoring Program for the Endangered Humpback Chub (
USFW Year
1978.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 6. <br />A BLM baseline survey team electrofished four Colorado squawfish on the Yampa <br />and White Rivers (Prewitt et al. 1977 and 1978). On 22 April 1977 a 539 min <br />squawfish was captured at site A on the Yampa River north of Maybell, Colorado. <br />On 27 May 1977 two squawfish, 570 and 485 mm, were captured at site C on the <br />White River, 2 km upstream from the confluence of Piceance Creek. On 27 <br />June 1977 a 472 mm squawfish was electrofished on the Yampa River at special <br />site Y2J near Juniper Hot Springs. Mr. George Kidd of Clifton, Colorado <br />captured a 565 mm squawfish in a hand seine on the Colorado River at or near <br />site A, Palisade, Colorado on 30 July 1977 (Kidd, personal communication). <br />The Yampa and White River sites of known squawfish captures were <br />sampled by seine,dip net, and electrofishing during 27-31 July. No squawfish <br />were seen or collected. Exceptionally low flows of 20 cfs on the Yampa and 50 cfs <br />on the White River were reported just prior to the trend zone and special <br />site sampling. However, rainstorms restored flows to levels experienced <br />during sampling for the BLM in June. Water levels on the Colorado, between <br />Palisade and Clifton were also critically low during our sampling trip. <br />When comparing the species compositions of the five trend zones it <br />becomes quite apparent that the White River has retained the greatest domin- <br />ance of native fishes over introduced species (Table 6). The dominance of <br />native fishes coupled with the recent captures of Colorado squawfish indi- <br />cates that the White River may offer more potential as endangered fish <br />habitat than previously thought. <br />Native fishes were also well represented in the Yampa River. However, <br />introduced species (carp, C rinus carpio; sandshiners, Notropis stramineus; <br />fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas and redside shiners, Richardsonius balteatus) <br />have become quite common. <br />The fish faunas in habitats sampled on the Colorado and Gunnison River <br />trend zones were dominated by introduced species (fathead minnows, sandshiners,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.