Laserfiche WebLink
300 <br />w <br />2 <br />J <br />0 <br />Zw <br />_ W <br />LL <br />W <br />w <br />( <br />Zm <br />QV <br />=a <br />U LL <br />?0 <br />J (n <br />ZZ <br />?0 <br />W = <br />Z~ <br />QZ <br />J <br />0- <br />X <br />W <br />Z <br />200 <br />100 <br />-100 <br />-200 <br />X ------ SMOOTHED CURVE <br />X <br />x X <br />X <br />X XX X X X X x x X xX <br />X X X !\ X X X XX X X <br />X ZC X X X\ . / / ` . <br />D( /X \ X XX XX / \ / I ? /` / <br />X w X xX `. X .?\ x X X X XX X W X? ` -.X X J x Xw y 1i W X <br />XiX x '? X XX Xk X x <br />kx W X %X X X X X X X X X79K <br />X X X X 10 Xc X x x x <br />X X X <br />X x x <br />X X X <br />X <br />X <br />1965 1970 1975 <br />-300 <br />WATER YEAR <br />1980 <br />Figure 28. Monthly, change in Lake Powell volume that is not explained by inflow-outflow mass balance. <br />fore, the mixing-tank concept seems appropriate for assess- <br />ing the long-term effect of Lake Powell on dissolved-solids <br />loads. Inflow volumes and loads are mixed in the reservoir, <br />and the variability of the outflow dissolved-solids concen- <br />tration has decreased. The loss or gain of dissolved solids <br />within the reservoir could not be detected. <br />SUMMARY <br />Annual and monthly concentrations and loads of <br />dissolved-solids and major constituents were estimated for <br />70 streamflow-gaging stations in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin. Trends in streamflow, dissolved-solids concentrations, <br />and dissolved-solids loads were identified. Nonparametric <br />trend-analysis techniques were used to determine long-term, <br />monotonic trends and step trends that resulted from human <br />activities upstream. Results were compared with physical <br />characteristics of the basin and historical water-resource <br />development in the basin to determine source areas of dis- <br />solved solids and possible cause of trends. <br />The mean annual dissolved-solids concentration of the <br />Colorado River increases from less than 100 mg/L in the <br />headwater streams to more than 500 mg/L at Lees Ferry, <br />1985 <br />Ariz., downstream from Lake Powell. For the 70 sites <br />analyzed in this report, mean annual flow-weighted concen- <br />tration ranged from 29 mg/L near the headwaters of the Colo- <br />rado River to 6,740 mg/L in Bitter Creek near Bonanza, <br />Utah. In headwater streams, calcium and bicarbonate are the <br />predominant dissolved constituents. Lower in the basin, in <br />areas underlain by sedimentary rocks, large quantities of <br />sulfate, sodium, and calcium are transported into the stream <br />system. In many streams in the Colorado Plateau province, <br />dissolved sulfate constitutes about 60 percent of the dissolved- <br />solids load. <br />For sites on streams that have a mean annual stream- <br />flow greater than 25,000 acre-ft, the maximum dissolved- <br />solids concentrations occurred downstream from areas where <br />irrigated agriculture has major effects on streamflow and <br />dissolved solids. Streams affected by irrigation return flow <br />include the Big Sandy, Price, San Rafael, Uncompahgre, and <br />Dirty Devil Rivers, McElmo and Salt Creeks, and Reed <br />Wash. In the basins of these streams (except the Big Sandy <br />River), large tracts of irrigated land are underlain by Mancos <br />Shale. At sites downstream from these areas, sulfate is the <br />predominant anion. Calcium or magnesium usually is the <br />predominant cation in streams in the Grand region and the <br />eastern side of the San Juan region. Sodium is the predomi- <br />60 Characteristics and Trends of Streamflow and Dissolved Solids in the Colorado River Basin