My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9521
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9521
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:38:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9521
Author
Liebermann, T. D., D. K. Mueller, J. E. Kircher and A. F. Choquette.
Title
Characteristics and Trends of Streamflow and Dissolved Solids in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1400 <br />Z 1200 <br />O <br /><tr <br />w <br />Z J 1000 <br />U OC <br />Zw <br />a <br />OC) to 800 <br />pQ <br />J cc <br />OJ <br />w 600 <br />OZ <br />In <br />25 400 <br />200 <br />?1 --- INFLOW <br />- OUTFLOW <br />it <br />P <br />I <br />1 it <br />I I I?i <br />+ + i 1 Iti t i ? ? ?? ? ? t <br />I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ? 11 1 1 tI 1{ 1 { 11 I <br />1 I 1 1 1? 1+ h { II I I p 11 1 <br />1 + 1 I I 1+ 11 1) 11 I I Il I ?1 1 1\ I 1+?= Ir <br />I 1 ? I I I 1 11 11 11 ? M I I! 1{ 1'nl 1 1 1 I IVI ? 1 <br />1 1 1 1 I 1 11 ? I{ 11 11 I JI 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 <br />11 i ! i? l I I I ! I I !l I It 1I V11 1 l i 1 1 1 1 I 1 IJ 11 I 1 1 <br />1 1 ! 1 <br />11 11 1 1{ 1 I I I\ 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 I li 1 <br />11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 ?i 1 1 1 I I ? 1 }1 l Iii ! <br />II I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I ! <br />1j 1 1 1 1 I 11 I ! 1 1 I I {{ I <br />11 11 1 11 II 11 11 1 1 II 11 1 I I II 11 I I ! 11 1 1 <br />I 11 1 11 11 I 11 1 <br />I 1 11 1 If 'III I I I I 11 11 11 11 I I I I I I 11 I <br />11. 11 I II II 1 <br />1 11 II <br />11 <br />I! I II II I1 11 II 11 11 1! II 1 1j 1 1 <br />11 1 N 11 II I1 11 11 II 11 II 11 1 11 11 11 <br />11 I ' ? ? II 11 ? II 11 11 V Ij 11 11 I; + <br />1+ I l1 ? y fl Al 1963 <br /> <br />1970 <br />1977 <br />1984 <br />WATER YEAR <br />Figure 27. Monthly dissolved-solids concentration in Lake Powell inflow and outflow. <br />Qo, m = the outflow volume during month m; <br />UV, m = the unexplained change in volume during month <br />m; <br />Cm = the flow-weighted mean dissolved-solids concen- <br />tration in the outflow during month m; <br />Cm -I = the flow-weighted mean dissolved-solids concen- <br />tration in the outflow during the previous month <br />(m -1); <br />L1, m = the total inflow dissolved-solids load during month <br />m; <br />Lo, m = the outflow dissolved-solids load during month m; <br />UL, m = the unexplained change in load during month m. <br />The unexplained changes in volume (Up m) and load (UL, m) <br />were defined to be negative if there was a loss in the reser- <br />voir during the month and positive if there was a gain. Unex- <br />plained losses of volume could be caused by evaporation or <br />bank storage. Unexplained volume gains could be due to <br />return flow from bank storage or unmeasured inflow. Over <br />a long period, evaporation probably has the greatest effect. <br />If equation 6 is accurate, the long-term mean value of UV <br />should be negative and approximately equal to the mean <br />monthly evaporation. Monthly values of UV are plotted in <br />figure 28 for the period of record after July 1965, when the <br />normal release program was implemented. The mean <br />monthly unexplained change in volume for that period was <br />-45,111 acre-ft, which indicates an annual loss of about <br />541,000 acre-ft from Lake Powell. A smoothed curve <br />through the monthly values shows the annual deviation about <br />this mean during the period. This loss closely corresponds <br />to U.S. Bureau of Reclamation estimates of evaporation from <br />the reservoir, which averaged about 517,000 acre-ft per year <br />for 1973-82 (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1982; J. <br />Osterberg, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, oral commun., <br />1986). Therefore, equation 6 seems appropriate for com- <br />puting reservoir storage. <br />If the primary source of water loss in Lake Powell is <br />actually evaporation, the dissolved-solids load would not be <br />affected. A long-term gain or loss identified by the mean <br />monthly unexplained change in load would indicate that a <br />chemical process, such as salt dissolution or precipitation, <br />was occurring in the reservoir. However, no consistent <br />departure from zero was found in the values of UL (fig. 29). <br />The values were evenly distributed around zero, which in- <br />dicates short-term fluctuations in mixing or inaccuracy of <br />the mass balance given by equation 7. The mean monthly <br />value was not significantly different from zero, and a <br />smoothed curve showed no trend during the period. There- <br />Lake Powell and Dissolved-Solids Outflow 59
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.