Laserfiche WebLink
existing legal and institutional systems for controlling instream <br />flows of inter- and intra-state waters. <br />5. A Regional Problem Analysis conducted by the Water Resources <br />Research Institutes of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho stressed the <br />need for improved coordinative mechanisms among State and Federal <br />agencies for determining instream flow needs and effecting their <br />enforcement. <br />Historically, water rights could be obtained in the West only through a State <br />appropriation for the purpose of applying the water out of the stream to some <br />"beneficial" use. What constitutes a beneficial use is defined by State law. <br />Beneficial uses historically included only municipal, industrial, stock <br />watering, agricultural, and mining. <br />However, there has developed a widespread recognition of the necessity for <br />maintaining water in the stream for such uses as recreation, fish and wildlife <br />production, and aesthetic enjoyment. This recognition has grown both in <br />public opinion and in water administration. Such recognition is particularly <br />critical in the face of increasing water demands for energy development and <br />expanded agricultural production. <br />Indeed, recent legislation and court decisions point to the need to identify <br />instream flow requirements and to quantify their magnitude. <br />By 1974 it was clear that a national program of sufficient scope and funding <br />depth was needed to address the issue in a comprehensive, coordinated (i.e., <br />