My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9510
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9510
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:28:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9510
Author
Jones, A. T.
Title
A Cross Section of Grand Canyon Archeology
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Excavations at Five Sites Along the Colorado River.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />f- <br /> <br />A.D. 1150 and A.D. 1300. F.ffland and Green (1979) support a date for <br />the end of the Cohonina sequence (Euler 1976; Euler and Green 1978) no <br />1 ater than A. D. 1150. <br />The origin of the Cohonina is equally deb~ted. Excavations done by <br />Jennings (1971) at Harbison Cave suggest,continuous occupation of the <br />area since Archaic times and thus, ~ situ development for the Cohonina. <br />His argument is based on some questionable o,bsidian hydration dates. <br />Others (Eul er and Green 1978; Hargrave 1937; McGregor 1951, 1967) <br />support the idea that the occupation was the result of ' migration into <br />the area. Still there is no agreement as to the direction from which <br />the Cohonina came. These probl ems and others of a descri pti ve and <br />cul ture.,.hi storical nature have been addressed sporadically and wi th <br />limited data (see also Schwartz 1955, 1966; \~hiting 1958; Schroeder <br />1957, 1975; Ferg 1977; James 1977 and ~/heat and Wheat 1954). If <br />questions of a culture.,.historical nature are unresolved, those dealing <br />with the behavior of the Cohonina are even more difficult to answer <br />given the spottiness and variability of the data. Recent surveys go far <br />toward providing a more solid data base that may answer these questions. <br />Preceding new development on the South Rim, Pilles (1973) surveyed <br />the Grand Canyon Village. As well as focusing on the relationship <br />between the Anasazi and Cohonina, he recorded a number of 1 imi ted <br />activity sites, primarily lithic scatters, for the first time. This <br />pattern is a dominant one on the South Rim. A thorough survey wi th <br />close to ,100 percent coverage was conducted by Eul er (1976) on the <br />Esplanade in the Grand Canyon below the Great Thumb. Systematic sample <br />surveys have been undertaken by Cartledge (1979) in the vicinity of <br />Si tgreaves Mounta in near Wil 1 i ams and by Effl and and Green (1979) in the <br />western portions of the Tusayan Ranger District of the Kaibab National <br />Forest south of Grand Canyon National Park. Cartledge (1979:315) <br />discredits the widely held idea that the Cohonina were a culturally <br />i ndi gent group outside the ma in stream of Southwest archeology. <br />t~uch research was done below the canyon rims during the late 1950s <br />and 1960s. Beginning with a trip by Taylor (1958), a number of <br />expeditions were mounted from the Colorado River (Euler and Taylor 1966; <br />Schwartz 1965, 1966). Others focused on the Archaic Split.,.Twig Figurine <br />Complex (Euler 1966b, 1984; Euler and Olson 1965; Farmer and deSaussure <br /> <br />r. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.