My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7327
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7327
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:28:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7327
Author
Johnson, J. E.
Title
Status of Endangered and Threatened Fish Species in Colorado.
USFW Year
1976.
USFW - Doc Type
T/N 280,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Their threatened species list for fish includes: <br />Scientific Name Common Name <br />5. Salmo clarki stomias Greenback cutthroat trout <br />6. Salmo clarki virginalis Rio Grande cutthroat trout <br />7. Salmo clarki pleuriticus Colorado cutthroat trout <br />8. Hybopsis aestivalis tetranemos Arkansas River speckled chub <br />9. Etheostoma cra ini Arkansas darter <br />10. Etheostoma nigrum nigrum Central johnny darter <br />11. Etheostoma spectabile pulchellum. Plains orange throat darter <br />Thus there is some confusion as to the status of several of these <br />species and in fact even the taxonomy of some is in question. It is <br />the belief of this office that all of the above species, on both state <br />and federal lists, are existing at reduced population levels within <br />the State boundaries, and all but the last four are truly in trouble <br />as a biological species or subspecies. The last two darters (E. ni rum <br />and E. spectabile) are widespread throughout their native range, and <br />reach their periphery in eastern Colorado streams (Hubbs and Lagler, <br />1970). The two Arkansas River endemics (E. cragini and H. aestivalis) <br />are also found in Kansas and Oklahoma streams but only in scattered <br />localities (Cross, 1967). Both are in need of further study before <br />any conclusions concerning their actual status as a biological species <br />is determined. It is believed that the Fish and Wildlife Service will <br />eventually move many of the species now classified as endangered over <br />to threatened species status because of the extreme limitations on any <br />management plans for endangered wildlife. Most of the declining wild- <br />life populations result from nonspecific disruption of their habitats, <br />and "hands on" management is necessary to correct these changes. The <br />threatened designation provides this freedom. <br />What follows is a general review of the status of those species known <br />to be existing at greatly reduced numbers in Colorado waters, some <br />reasons for their decline, and BLM's potential input into their survi- <br />val. <br />I. Trouts <br />All four recognized cutthroat trout subspecies in Colorado are part <br />of the highly variable gene pool of Salmo clarki. Although there is <br />still considerable debate as to the authenticity of these and several <br />other subspecies of cutthroat trout, most authorities agree S. clarki <br />has formed isolated populations in headwater streams of major drainages <br />in Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico, Utah, California, and Oregon. The <br />questions of degree of isolation and differentiation account for the <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />n <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />n <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.