Laserfiche WebLink
u <br /> <br />I Field Data Collection Procedures <br />The following sequence outlines the field measurements at each study site. Field data <br />collection occurred from June through September. <br /> Habitat Mapping <br /> Habitat mapping was conducted as a means to detect changes in habitat conditions that <br /> could affect fish and macroinvertebrate populations. Habitat mapping was completed for <br /> various distances around each study site based on access. (Habitat mapping used a <br /> protocol developed by Pike & San Isabel National Forest basinwide survey (Winters and <br /> Bennett 1994)). This protocol allows the quantification of specific instream and <br /> streambank parameters. Data collected during mapping by the field crew included <br /> habitat type, length, width, structural association, substrate type, bank erodability, bank <br /> rock content, and presence of large organic debris. Field data are input into a computer <br /> spreadsheet and analyzed using the basinwide program developed by the Pike & San <br /> Isabel National Forest. <br /> <br /> Transect Placement <br /> T <br />t <br />l <br />d i <br />h h <br /> ransec <br />s were p <br />ace <br />n eac <br />abitat type to represent the hydraulic conditions within <br /> each habitat type. Additional transects were placed at hydraulic locations within the <br /> habitat type to ensure better model calibration and simulation. <br />I Ground survey <br />Vertical elevations were established throughout each habitat type by establishing a <br />relative benchmark at each study site. Each study site was surveyed using a standard auto <br />' level and differential leveling. Specific stream cross sections were surveyed for use in <br />the hydraulic model. Multiple data sets of water-surface elevations and point velocity <br />measurements will be used to calibrate the hydraulic model to simulate depth and <br />Draft 2001 Task Summary Report Page 5 <br />Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. December 18, 2001