My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9615
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:46:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9615
Author
Miller, W. J., D. E. Rees and J. A. Ptacek.
Title
Draft Summary of 2001 Tasks Fryingpan/Roaring Fork Rivers Fishery Study.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />There are several hydraulic submodels that can be used with IFIM. These include IFG4, <br />WSP and MANSQ. We have tailored our field data collection to allow the use of any of <br />these models. The 2001 IFIM data collection included several steps: study segment <br />location, habitat mapping, transect placement and data collection. <br />The site specific procedures at each site were as follows: <br />i • Locate study sites using topographic maps, landowner information and <br />professional judgment. <br />• Percentage of each habitat type was calculated from the mapped data. <br />'? • Transects were placed in all habitats that represent over 5 % of the total available <br />habitat. The number of transects placed in each habitat type depended on the <br />physical and hydraulic features of each habitat type. Transects were placed in <br />homogeneous habitat types. Additional hydraulic control transects will be placed <br />by professional judgment at pool-riffle interfaces. The main criteria for transect <br />selection were those listed in Bovee (1982). We further refined the transect <br />selection with use of the habitat mapping approach that is now the preferred <br />field methodology (Bovee 1989). <br />i • For each set of transects in each habitat type the following survey data was <br /> collected: Ground survey to establish horizontal reference points, distance <br /> between transects, field notes with reference to general habitat and stream <br /> conditions in the transect areas, reference photos for the habitat and for each <br />I transect within the habitat type. <br />I • Transect specific data included: stream bed profile, mean column velocity at <br />selected locations (verticals) along the transect line, visual estimates of dominant <br />and subdominant substrate size and percent embeddedness, and percent cover. <br />Draft 2001 Task Summary Report Page 4 <br />Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. December 18, 2001
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.