My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9436
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9436
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:40:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9436
Author
McAda, C. W.
Title
Subadult and Adult Colorado Pikeminnow Monitoring; Summary of Results, 1986-2000.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Recovery Program Project Number 22,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TABLE 3. -Relationship between river-wide mean CPE (CPM/hr; all sampling <br />reaches combined) and population estimates for years when population estimates were <br />available (Osmundson and Burnham 1998; Nesler 2000; Osmundson 2002). <br />River Years rz P SE <br />Nesler (2000) <br />Colorado 1991-1997 -0.19 0.82 127.70 <br />Green 1992- 1997 0.49 0.07 1400.67 <br />Yampa i 992- 1997 -0.21 0.75 65.21 <br />White 1992- 1997 0.77 0.01 58.97 <br />Osmundson and Burnham (1998) <br />Colorado 1992-1994 0.76 0.22 34.7b <br />Osmundson (2002) <br />Colorado 1998-2000 0.41 0.36 15.39 <br />-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />Osmundson and Burnham (1998), Osmundson (2002) <br />Colorado 1992-1994; 1998-2000 0.24 0.18 88.72 <br />annual histograms for the White and Yampa rivers shifted among size groups but reflected <br />mostly adult-sized fish in all yeazs. In contrast, the Green and Colorado rivers varied <br />considerably among years and reflected more young fish than adults in some years. These <br />differences may reflect strong yeaz classes entering the adult population. This was most <br />evident in the Green River during 1989-1993 and 1995-2000 (Figure A-1). Fewer fish were <br />captured in the Colorado River, so shifts in length-frequency distribution were not as evident <br />(Figure A-2). However, large numbers of small fish were captured in some years. <br />Average length-frequency distributions provide the best evidence for differences among <br />rivers (Figure 9). The Yampa River contained only large fish; no fish smaller than 400 mm <br />was collected during this study. In contrast, a large percentage of fish collected from the <br />Green River were less than 400 mm. Small fish were also collected from the Colorado and <br />White rivers, but not to the same extent as the Green River. Figures 10 and 11 compare <br />length-frequency distributions for the upper and cower portions of the Green and Colorado <br />rivers. In both rivers, more small fish were found in lower reaches than in upper reaches. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.