My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9436
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9436
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:40:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9436
Author
McAda, C. W.
Title
Subadult and Adult Colorado Pikeminnow Monitoring; Summary of Results, 1986-2000.
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Recovery Program Project Number 22,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />v <br />W <br />a <br />U <br />m <br />s <br />5 <br />4 <br />3 <br />2 <br />1 <br />0 <br />-1 <br />------------------------------------------- <br />White River <br />- ------------- ----------------------- <br />I ~ i <br /> <br />86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 <br />Year <br />FIGURE 8. -Mean CPE (CPM/hr) of Colorado pikeminaow in the White River, <br />1986-2000. Vertical bars represent 95% confidence intervals; regression results are <br />provided in Table A-9. <br />Relationship Between Mean CPE and Population Estimates <br />Population estimates were available for 1992-1997 in the Green, Yampa, and White rivers <br />(Kesler 2000) and for three different time periods in the Colorado River - 1991-1997 <br />(Kesler 2000}, 1992-1994 (Osmundson and Burnham 1998), and 1998-2000 (Osmundson <br />2002}. Linear regressions were calculated for each river by time period and in the Colorado <br />River for the combined period encompassed by the two Osmundson estimates. Mean CPE <br />and population estimates were poorly correlated, with the White River exhibiting the only <br />significant relationship at Ps0.05 (Table 3). However, the relationship in the Green River <br />was significant at Ps0.1 (Table 3). <br />Size Structure <br />Annual length-frequency distributions for the Green, Colorado, Yampa, and White rivers <br />are provided in Figures A-1-A-4. Annual length-frequency distributions for the upper and <br />lower reaches of the Green and Colorado rivers are provided in Figures A-5-A-6. Annual <br />histograms varied among rivers, but generally reflected the same patterns. For example, <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.