My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8005
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:40:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8005
Author
McAda, C. W.
Title
Mechanical Removal Of Northern Pike From The Gunnison River, 1995-1996.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
58,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
in the main channel could also provide competition for young razorbacks learning to survive <br />in the riverine environment. White suckers should be removed from the Gunnison River <br />when encountered during routine sampling. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />Objective 1: Evaluate standard techniaues for efficient removal of nonnative predators. <br />Shoreline electrofishing was effective at capturing northern pike for removal from the <br />Gunnison River near Delta. Because of lack of reproduction and its small size, the northern <br />pike population in the Gunnison River can be controlled with mechanical means. The <br />population occupies a small area that can be effectively sampled with relatively Little effort. <br />Limited sampling can capture enough pike to substantially depress the population if efforts <br />are directed at time periods when northern pike are most vulnerable. Based on this study, <br />shoreline electrofishing when river flows are between 85-113 mils will be the most effective <br />sampling technique. <br />Green sunfish and black bullhead were the only other predators collected during this <br />study. Because these species are common in the Gunnison River and are actively <br />reproducing in the Delta area, controlling their populations will be considerably more <br />difficult than northern pike. Although sampling with traditional methods (e.g. electrofishing, <br />trammel and fyke nets, seining) can remove large numbers of these species, their populations <br />will quickly rebound because of their high reproductive potential. Control of these species <br />will require use of piscicides or water Level manipulation in floodplain habitats where they <br />are most common. Control of these (and similar) species is currently being addressed by the <br />pond reclamation program already funded by the Recovery Program. <br />Objective 2. Estimate relative decline in nonnative predators as a result of fish removal. <br />Based on change in catch rate (both electrofishing alone and all gears combined), <br />numbers of northern pike declined notably in the Gunnison River in 1995 and remained low <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.