My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8174
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8174
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:37:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8174
Author
Martinez, P. J.
Title
West Slope Warmwater Fisheries.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table 4. Summary of habitat suitability scores for the proposed enlargement of Elkhead Reservoir for <br />northem pike, channel catfish (reproducing and stocked), smallmouth bass and largemouth bass <br />based on model application found in Appendix D; and habitat suitability scores for black <br />crappie, common carp, white sucker, yellow perch, and stocked rainbow trout based on <br />McConnell et al. (1984). <br />Fish Species Five-digit <br />reservoir description Habitat suitability <br />Warmwater fish species <br />Black crappie L <br />Largemouth bass L <br />Smallmouth bass L <br />Channel catfish <br />stocked 13 123 LM <br />Channel catfish <br />(reproducing) L <br />Common carp L <br />Coolwater fish species <br />White sucker LM <br />Yellow perch 13 123 LM <br />Northern pike L <br />Coldwater fish species <br />Rainbow trout <br />stocked 2 3 12 3 LM <br />The characteristics of the existing reservoir and/or the enlarged version and the past and/or <br />forecasted performance of the various sport fish species available for management in Elkhead reservoir lends <br />insight into screening options and the requirements for retention of various fish life stages. Reproduction by <br />catfish and northern pike appears unlikely. Reproduction by bass can be prolific (unpublished data), but <br />recruitment appears low. Given these circumstances and the circumstantial evidence that largemouth bass <br />survive poorly in riverine environments and that young-of-year smallmouth bass escaping the reservoir prior <br />to 1992 did not appear to proliferate in the Yampa River, the argument could be made that the reservoir could <br />be fitted with a screen mesh sufficient to retain Age-0 and older sport fishes. <br />A larger mesh screen would require a smaller structure, presumably of less initial cost and less <br />maintenance and operation costs. Also, the provision in the Procedures whereby fish removed from riverine <br />environments and transferred to screened, off-stem impoundments (Appendix A) could apply to an Elkhead <br />Reservoir screened with a larger mesh since it is likely that only life stages of sport fishes older that Age-0 <br />would be transplanted to screened impoundments. During periods of active fish removal from rivers (Yampa <br />in particular), Elkhead could serve as a receiving water for adult sport fishes, thus restoring some of the <br />12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.