Laserfiche WebLink
that the model proved to be highly predictive based on past experience with various fish species in the <br />reservoir. <br />The reservoir rated "low" in suitability for all warmwater fish species except stocked channel catfish <br />(Table 4). While the thermal regime of the reservoir would preclude natural reproduction of channel catfish, <br />a handful of catfish that had been stocked in the reservoir in the 1980s and subsequently sampled during <br />surveys in the reservoir displayed good body condition (unpublished data). Despite the ability of smallmouth <br />and largemouth bass to reproduce in the reservoir, neither species attained great abundance and age-growth <br />data showed growth of smallmouth bass in the reservoir was slow, with the bass reaching 15 in. (380 mm) in <br />9 to 10 years (unpublished data). <br />For the coolwater species for which the model's habitat scores have been defined, an enlarged <br />Elkhead Reservoir ranked "low-medium" for white sucker and yellow perch, but low for northern pike (Table <br />4). While white sucker accounted for one of the highest percentages of fish species captured by a <br />combination of seining, gill netting and electrofishing in 1987 (16% of 1,255 fish), it was outnumbered by <br />native flannelmouth sucker (28%) and roundtail chub (21%), and smallmouth bass (21%) (Martinez <br />unpublished data). Also, none of the white suckers captured in 1987 were of the larger sizes (> 400 mm) <br />observed in other Colorado reservoirs suggesting less than favorable environmental conditions for this <br />species. Yellow perch have never been introduced into the reservoir, and despite the higher habitat ranking <br />for this species relative to the other species evaluated, the results of this modeling indicate that the <br />performance of this species in the reservoir would be predictably poor. <br />Rainbow trout, at one time regularly stocked in Elkhead, are not part of the current Lake <br />Management Plan prepared for the reservoir (Elmblad et al. 1994). On the basis of temperature, Elkhead is <br />certainly suitable for trout as surface waters only reach or exceed 70° F for only short periods during summer. <br />This thermal regime contributed to the suitability score for this species of "low-medium" (Table 4). The ease <br />of escapement and the turbidity of the inflowing water combine such that many trout spilled from the <br />reservoir during runoff. This scenario has made it difficult to retain trout as more than a short-term <br />component of the fishery in most years. An enlarged Elkhead would possess these same characteristics, but <br />installation of a screen to minimize fish escapement (Miller and Laiho 1996) may make management of the <br />reservoir with catchable rainbow trout more effective, whether the reservoir is enlarged or not. <br />It is almost difficult to conceive of a reservoir which does not rank at least high-medium for some <br />desirable sport fish or prey fish species. However, conditions in Elkhead reservoir, including a thermal <br />regime that is neither optimum for coldwater or warmwater fish species during the summer months, is <br />probably largely responsible for the marginal performance of species introduced to the reservoir to date. <br />While the thermal regime might seem more favorable for coolwater species, the unique turbidity situation <br />wherein there is surprisingly little sediment deposition or nutrient input, but rather a colloidal suspension <br />during spring and other runoff events (R. Tenney, Colorado River Water Conservation District, personal <br />communication), apparently restricts production. <br />It also appears turbidity encourages escapement of some species (e.g. northern pike and rainbow <br />trout). However, until 1992, smallmouth bass remained in the reservoir in fairly high numbers, although <br />escapement of primarily young-of-year bass less than 75 mm has been documented (Martinez unpublished <br />data, Miller and Rees 1995). In 1992, draining of the reservoir for repair of the dam resulted in flushing from <br />the reservoir an apparently high proportion of sub-adult and adult smallmouth bass (Tyus and Saunders <br />1996, Appendix H). This flushing of bass from Elkhead reservoir is believed to be responsible for the <br />decline of the reservoir's bass fishery and for the stark increase in the number of smallmouth bass collected in <br />the Yampa River in recent years (B. Elmblad, Colorado Division of Wildlife, personal communication). <br />11