Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />bass, and fathead minnow). The mapping of this information was limited to the available spatial <br />information in the records we received. Often there were addresses, cadastral information, or <br />lake/pond names that did not allow us to link the potential stocking activity with particular <br />waters. If the receiving water was thought to have been located within one square mile, the best <br />approximation of the location was used. <br />We used spatially explicit queries in ArcGIS 8.1 to determine whether these stocking <br />events intersected both the 6,500-foot elevation contour and the 50- and 100-year flood plains. <br />However, since many of the stocking events were accurate only to a section, or about a square <br />mile, it should be kept in mind that the flood plain designation of these events is prone to error. <br />Pre- and Post-Regulation Abundance of Selected Nonnative Fishes in Backwaters <br />The goal of this portion of the study was to determine the change in backwater distribution <br />and density of selected, regulated nonnative fish species in the ISA of the Colorado River from <br />river mile 185-152 in response to regulatory restrictions on the stocking of nonnative, <br />nonsahnonid fishes. Data sources referenced or utilized for this effort included four projects in <br />the Grand Valley reach of the Colorado River, whose time frame coincided with the period <br />investigated during this study, 1997-2001: <br />1) Recent data from the Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program's (ISMP) Fall seining in <br />backwaters of the Colorado River, 1997-2000 (Ehnblad 2003) <br />2) An evaluation of the (ISMP) sampling protocol, 1997-1998 (Bundy and Bestgen 2001). <br />3) The removal of cyprinids from backwaters by seining, 1999-2001 (Trammell et al. 2002). <br />4) The removal of centrarchids from backwaters by electrofishing, 1999-2001 (Osmundson <br />2003). <br />Due to known deficiencies in the fish stocking permit record, particularly the pre- <br />regulation stocking period of 1998-1999, much of the effort in this section was devoted to spatial <br />pattern analyses intended to detect patterns relating potential sources of nonnative species. <br />These potential sources included post-regulation stocking events in 2000-2001, and floodplain <br />pond populations based on locations or high densities of nonnative species in critical habitat in <br />the Colorado River. <br />In order to detect spatial patterns in the presence and abundance of nonnative species <br />within critical habitat in relation to potential sources, we employed three primary approaches: 1) <br />visual pattern detection, 2) proximity analysis, and 3) geostatistics (spatial correlation analysis). <br />It was difficult to focus exclusively on pre- and post-regulation data given the distribution of <br />dates for particular datasets. We could not use many pair-wise comparisons between potential <br />sources and riverine populations that were consistent throughout the relevant time periods <br />because there were few consistencies among data across years. Where possible and appropriate, <br />we indicate pre- and post-regulation data. Also, it was understood that nonnative removal efforts <br />in the river and backwaters, pond treatments, and stocking regulations were all completed/ <br />implemented by spring 1999. This renders many analyses irrelevant for determining what may <br />have caused any change observed. <br />8 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />