Laserfiche WebLink
(Karp and Tyus 1990a). A single humpback was collected in 1980 at Cross Mountain <br />Canyon of the Yampa River (USFWS 1980; Wick et al. 1981), and several specimens were <br />collected in 1988 from the Little Snake River 6.25 miles upstream from the confluence with <br />the Yampa River (Ed Wick, NPS, pers. comm.). <br />STATUS <br />This species is most often found in relatively inaccessible canyons, so it is not surprising that <br />the species remained undiscovered until after World War II when the use of rubber rafts <br />allowed easier access to canyon areas for sampling and research. The few remaining <br />populations of humpback chub are limited to remote reaches in canyon areas of the Basin. <br />This species decline, like the other Colorado River endangered fish, is attributed to <br />streamflow alteration, competition, increased predation, in addition to hybridization with <br />other members of the genus Gila (Stalnaker and Holden 1973; Rosenfeld and Wilkinson <br />1989). <br />HABITAT REQUIREMENTS <br />Populations of humpback chub are found in river canyons, where they utilize a variety of <br />habitats, including pools, riffles, and eddies. Most of the existing information on habitat <br />preferences has been obtained from adult fish in the Little Colorado River, the Grand <br />Canyon, and the Black Rocks of the Colorado River (Holden and Stalnaker 1975a; Kaeding <br />and Zimmerman 1983; Kaeding et al. 1990). In these locations, the fish are found associated <br />with boulder-strewn canyons, travertine dams, pools, and eddies. Some habitat-use data are <br />also available from the Yampa River Canyon where the fish occupy similar habitats, but also <br />use rocky runs, riffles, rapids, and shoreline eddies (Karp and Tyus 1990a). This diversity <br />in habitat use suggests that the adult fish is adapted to a variety of habitats, and studies of <br />tagged fish indicated that they move between habitats, presumably in response to seasonal <br />habitat changes and life history needs (Kaeding and Zimmerman 1983; Karp and Tyus <br />1990a). Spring peak flows, availability of shoreline eddy and deep canyon habitats, and <br />competition and predation by nonnative fishes were reported as potential factors limiting <br />reproduction of humpback chub in the Yampa River (Tyus and Karp 1989; Karp and Tyus <br />1990a). <br />Spawning Habitat <br />Humpback chub in reproductive condition are usually captured in May, June, and July, <br />depending on location. Little is known about their specific spawning requirements, other <br />than the fish spawn soon after the highest spring flows when water temperatures approach <br />68°F (Kaeding et al. 1990; Karp and Tyus 1990a; USFWS 1990b). The importance of <br />spring flows and proper temperatures for humpback chub is stressed by Kaeding and <br />Zimmerman (1983), who implicated flow reductions and low water temperatures in the <br />Grand Canyon as factors curtailing successful spawn of the fish and increasing its <br />competition with other species. <br />28