My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7845
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7845
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:29:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7845
Author
Miller, W. J. and D. Laiho.
Title
Final Report, Upper Colorado River Basin Recovery Implementation Program, Feasibility Evaluation Of Non-Native Fish Control Structures.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />' movement. Electrical barriers, like all other behavioral devices, are considered experimental at this <br />time and are not a standard application at downstream protection facilities. <br />Typical Advantages <br />' • Successful in stopping upstream migrants <br />0 Lower cost for construction than standard physical screen <br />• Useful in shallow canals or inlets <br />• Used at locations with lower flow volumes <br />Typical Disadvantages <br />' • Response to electrical field is species and life stage specific <br />• Electrical barriers are not useful with passive life stages <br />• Electrical field fatigues fish which then become entrained in the flow <br />• Require multiple fields and multiple field strengths to deter a wide variety of size classes at one <br />location <br />• Main disadvantage: In the current application, there is a danger to humans and large animals that <br />would fall into the field and be subject to electrocution. <br />Application to Limiting Downstream Passage. Prevention of downstream passage has shown <br />' mixed results. The installation requires a shallow water depth and that it also is used usually in <br />conjunction with other technology. They have been most successful in preventing upstream <br />migration, not downstream migration. It also would require a secondary bypass once the fish are <br />' moved away from the spillway or outlet works. In previous applications, a DC electrical field has <br />been used to stun the fish and move them into the bypass because of either stress or the inability of <br />the fish to locate the bypass once they have been subject to the AC field for deterrence. This system <br />' could be used in conjunction with some other technology under the current projects but it is not as <br />successful at preventing downstream migration as standard technologies. <br />1.3.7.2 Sound <br />Characteristics. Recent work on sound systems has focused on both high and low frequency <br />systems. Sound systems consist of speaker arrays to distribute sound through the water and speakers <br />generally are mounted in underwater locations. Speakers are usually located underwater to deploy <br />either sound such as natural predators or pure tones. Frequencies vary at each application. Sounds <br />customized to each specie's hearing abilities are shown to be the most effective. This requires <br />considerable research and experimentation for each specie to be deterred at the installed location. <br />' Typical Existing Applications. Sound systems have been experimentally evaluated in the northeast <br />and midwest. Generally they consist of underwater speakers used at sluice gates such as the <br />application that was investigated at Allegheny Reservoir, Pennsylvania. In this application, <br />' percussion type sounds were used at sluiceways. No change in fish passage through the sluices was <br />noted during the experimentation. The target species at this location was walleye. Installation of a <br />system at Racine Hydroelectric Plant on the Ohio River showed deterrence of 70% of the basses and <br />' catfish present at the intakes area of the hydroelectric plant. This system was a low frequency, high <br />amplitude sound produced by a submerged generator. <br />' Control Structure Feasibility Evaluation 1-23 <br />Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc., February 18, 1997
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.