Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />t <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />i <br />1 <br />1 <br />r <br />i <br />e <br />t <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />w <br />U <br />W <br />~ 60 <br />U <br />~ 40 <br />0 <br />0 20 <br />} <br />z 0 <br />w <br />O <br />w 60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~S <br />~ ~~ <br />~~~~iiii <br />CS <br />® CH <br />rr-r-rrrr <br />CS <br />FH <br />0 <br />-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <br />FACTOR 1 <br />^ ~S <br />RS <br />-rr-rrr-r <br />CS <br />SS <br />-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <br />FACTOR 1 <br />Figure 6. Distribution of Colorado squawfish and the six species for which <br />comparisons were made along discriminant function one, Colorado <br />River, RM 0-70, 1980. The relative contribution of the measured <br />habitat variables to discriminant function one is provided in Table <br />5. (CS=Colorado squawfish, RS=red shiner, SS=sand shiner, CH=Gila <br />spp., CC=channel catfish, FH=fathead minnow, and SDI-speckled dace). <br />21 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />