Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />t <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />w <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~S <br />RS <br />z <br />w <br />~ 60 <br />U <br />0 40 <br />0 20 <br />} <br />z 0 <br />'- ~ C S :. <br />~H , <br />i F <br /> ~; <br /> <br />~ 60 <br />~ 40 <br />~ 20 <br />0 <br />w <br />~ -S -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <br />~. 60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br /> CS i <br />r <br />i ~ FH <br />FACTOR 1 <br />-5-4-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <br />FACTOR 1 <br />Figure 5. Distribution of Colorado squawfish and the six species for which <br />comparisons were made along discriminant function one, Colorado <br />River, RM 0-70, 1979. The relative contribution of the measured <br />habitat variables to discriminant function one is provided in Table <br />5. (CS=Colorado squawfish, RS=red shiner, SS=sand shiner, CH=Gila <br />spp., CC=channel catfish, FH=fathead minnow, and SD=speckled dace). <br />20 <br />