My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8166
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8166
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/18/2009 12:27:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8166
Author
McAda, C. W. and L. R. Kaeding.
Title
Relations Between the Habitat Use of Age-0 Colorado Squawfish and Those of Other Sympatric Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />0.9 and three cases between 0.7 and 0.8. Gila spp. ranged from 0.587 to <br />0.938, only one value exceeded 0.9. Most values were between 0.8 and 0.9. <br />Speckled dace showed the most discrimination in habitat use with Colorado <br />I squawfish. Lambda ranged from 0.2 to 0.770, with two cases greater than 0.7, <br />two cases between 0.6 and 0.7, and four cases less than 0.6. <br />Habitat ,and diet overlap indices are often considered to be biologically <br />significant at values exceeding 0.6 (e.g., Wallace 1981). Although <br />technically not an overlap index, lambda behaves in much the same way by <br />1 measuring the difference in habitat use between the species. Thus the <br />assumption that values of lambda greater than 0.6 are biologically meaningful <br />' may be reasonable. Certainly values greater than 0.6 reflect great similarity <br />in habitat use between species. <br />The correlations between the discriminating variables and the dependent <br />canonical factors indicate which of the measured variables (depth, velocity or <br />substrate) had the greatest effect on separation in habitat use between <br />species (Appendix Tables 5 and 6). Depth was the most important contributor <br />to discrimination between Gila spp. and Colorado squawfish habitat, whereas <br />velocity and substrate size were the most important variables to discriminate <br />1 between age-0 Colorado squawfish habitat and that utilized by channel catfish <br />and speckled dace (Appendix Tables 5 and 6). Because no distinction existed <br />' between habitat used by Colorado squawfish and that occupied by red shiner, <br />sand shiner or fathead minnow, the relative contribution of the measured <br />habitat variables is meaningless. <br />In the Green River, C/E of fathead minnow was significantly correlated <br />with C/E of age-0 Colorado squawfish in backwaters in five of the six cases <br />L examined. However, the correlation coefficients (r) were low, ranging <br />' 10 <br />t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.