Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />t <br />t <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />t <br />1 <br />i <br />1 <br />1 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />w <br />U <br />60 <br />U 40 <br />U <br />O <br />,~ 20 <br />O <br />U 0 <br />z <br />u, <br />w <br />~ 60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~S - <br />~ ~~ <br />1 1 1 1 1 1 1 <br />CS <br />CH <br />^ ~S <br />FH <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />CS <br />RS <br />iiii~ii~ <br />C S JI <br />SD _ <br />IIIIIIII <br />CS <br />SS _ <br />-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <br />FACTOR 1 FACTOR 1 <br />Figure 4. Distribution of Colorado squawfish and the six species for which <br />comparisons were made along discriminant function one, Green <br />River, 1980. The relative contribution of the measured habitat <br />variables to discriminant function one is provided in Table 6• <br />(CS=Colorado squawfish, RS=red shiner, SS=sand shiner, CH=Gala <br />spp., CC=channel catfish, FH=fathead minnow, and SD=speckled <br />dace). <br />9 <br />