Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />l <br />i <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />w <br />z <br />~ 60 <br />U 40 <br />U <br />O <br />20 <br />O <br />U 0 <br />z <br />LL, <br />LL, <br />~ 60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~s <br />~ ~~ <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~S <br />CH <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~S <br />FH <br /> CS <br /> i <br />RS -, <br />I <br /> i <br />r <br />~~~~ <br />^ C S ~' <br />SD ~I <br />~~~~~~~ <br />~ CS <br />~ SS <br />-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <br />FACTOR 1 FACTOR 1 <br />Figure 2. Distribution of Colorado squawfish and the six species for which <br />comparisons were made along discriminant function one, Colorado <br />River, 1980. The relative contribution of the measured habitat <br />variables to discriminant function one is provided in Table 5. <br />(CS=Colorado squawfish, RS=red shiner, SS=sand shiner, CH=Gila <br />spp., CC=channel catfish, FH=fathead minnow, and SD=speckled <br />dace). <br /> <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />