Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />i <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />w <br />U <br />60 <br />U 40 <br />U <br />O <br />,~ 20 <br />O <br />U 0 <br />w <br />C~ <br />W <br />~ 60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~S - <br />~ ~~ <br /> ^ ~S <br /> CH <br /> <br />^ ~s <br />FH <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />^ ~s <br />RS <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />~~~~~r~~ <br />CS <br />SD <br />~~~~~~~ <br />CS <br />SS <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <br />FACTOR 1 FACTOR 1 <br />Figure 1. Distribution of Colorado squawfish and the six species for which <br />comparisons were made along discriminant function one, Colorado <br />River, 1979. The relative contribution of the measured habitat <br />variables to discriminant function one is provided in Table 5. <br />(CS=Colorado squawfish, RS=red shiner, SS-sand shiner, CH-Gila <br />spp., CC=channel catfish, FH=fathead minnow, and SD=speckled <br />dace). <br />6 <br />