Laserfiche WebLink
instances. Correlations between gmean CPE for Colorado squawfish and backwater maximum depth <br />were generally very weak and not significant. Only one significant relationship was found-a weak, <br />negative relationship (r=-.34) in Reach 4 during 1988 (Table B-10). <br />Temperature preferences of YOY Colorado squawfish were evaluated based on the temperature of <br />the backwater when sampled and the difference in temperature between the backwater and the main <br />channel. Descriptive histograms were developed based on 1 °C intervals. ANOVA was based on <br />four categories (9 to 15°C, 16 to 19°C, 20 to 23°C, and 24 to 32°C) for backwater temperature and <br />three categories for temperature difference between main channel and backwater (-5 to -1 °C, 0 to <br />+3°C, and +4 to +18°C). Frequency distributions of temperatures of backwaters containing <br />Colorado squawfish were not obviously different from those that did not contain Colorado squawfish. <br />T-tests of backwater temperature between backwaters that contained Colorado squawfish versus those <br />that did not showed significant differences in 6 of the 22 cases examined (Reach 1, 1988 and 1989; <br />Reach 3, 1990; and Reach 4, 1987, 1988, and 1989). All of the significant cases had a warmer mean <br />temperature for backwaters that contained Colorado squawfish than for backwaters that did not; <br />however the difference between the two mean temperatures was small-1.8 to 2.4°C. T-tests <br />compazing temperature differences between main channel and backwaters showed significant <br />differences in only two cases-Reach 1 in 1988 and Reach 4 in 1987. These two cases had <br />temperatures in backwaters containing Colorado squawfish wazmer than the main channel by a lazger <br />amount than the backwaters without Colorado squawfish, but the differences were small-about <br />1.4°C. <br />ANOVA revealed significant differences in eight cases among the four backwater categories for <br />backwater temperature and in six cases among the three categories of temperature difference. In all <br />cases compazing backwater temperature, the highest catch rate occurred in either the 20 to 23°C <br />category or the 24 to 32°C category. The one exception occurred in 1986 in Reach 1 when no <br />backwaters in the two warmer categories were sampled. In this case, catch rate was higher in the 16 <br />to 19°C category than in the lowest temperature category. Of the significant cases comparing <br />temperature difference between the backwater and main channel, four cases had higher catch rates in <br />backwaters that were wazmer than the main channel and two cases had higher catch rates in <br />backwaters that were cooler than the main channel. Pearson correlation coefficients between gmean <br />CPE of Colorado squawfish and backwater temperature or temperature difference were generally low <br />and not significant. Three of 21 cases were significant for temperature difference (Reach 2, 1986 <br />[r=.72], Reach 3, 1987 [r=.34]; and Reach 4, 1986 [r=.45]; Table B-10) and 3 were significant for <br />backwater temperature (Reach 2, 1986 [r=.72]; Reach 3, 1987 [r=.41]; and Reach 4, 1987 [r=.39]. <br />The significant cases showed a positive relationship between temperature and catch rate, but many of <br />the other cases exhibited negative relationships between the two variables. <br />~~p~tric Species <br />All fish collected in a seine haul were counted in about 25% of all seine efforts (first seine haul in <br />primazy backwaters). Red shiner, fathead minnow, and sand shiner were the most common species <br />collected in these samples (Figure 7; Tables B-11-B-14). These three species combined composed <br />from 68 to 99% of all species collected from seine hauls where all fish were counted (22 of 28 <br />observations were greater than 90%). Red shiner was overwhelmingly the most common species <br />collected in the Green River (60 to 95% in Reach 3 and 57 to 85% in Reach 4). Fathead minnow <br />was generally second in abundance (2 to 25 % in Reach 3 and 8 to 31 % in Reach 4) and sand shiner <br />was third (0.2 to 12%). Fathead minnow and red shiner were more evenly represented in the catch <br />from the Colorado River. Fathead minnow was typically most common in Reach 2 (42 to 69%) and <br />16 <br />