Laserfiche WebLink
160 Co+rservation Genetics of laesen Fishes <br />rescued, literally at the last minute, and held in captivity <br />until spring flow resumed. Likewise, existence of the <br />Devil's Hole pupfish (Cyprinodon diabolis) was jeop- <br />ardized when the water level in its single habitat was <br />being lowered by groundwater pumping. Only a Su- <br />preme Court decision to halt development in the region <br />restored flow and maintained this habitat (Pinter 1979, <br />1985 ). Thus, the goal for conservation efforts of fishes in <br />this model is simply to maintain strong, isolated popu- <br />lations. <br />Amore complicated version of the Death Valley <br />model occurs with Cyprinodon macularius in the vi- <br />cinity of the Salton Sea sink in southern California. Using <br />Turner's (1983) electrophoretic data, Echelle, Echelle, <br />and Edds (1987) were able to partition total genetic <br />diversity into H~ and D~~ components. Polymorphism <br />Natural Flow <br />0.3\~ <br />~ ~ <br />~ ~ <br />~ / <br />~ 0.8 / <br />~`l~ <br />I <br />I <br />0.01 J <br />Meffe snd Vrijenhoek <br />within Lakeshore colonies accounted for about 70% of <br />the total genetic variance, and differences among colo- <br />nies accounted for about 30%, contrary to expectations <br />of the Death Valley model. However, this is easily ex- <br />plained in the context of the hydrologic history of this <br />region. These populations have been repeatedly sub- <br />jected to isolation and possible reconnection during <br />several rounds of drying and flooding in the lake basin. <br />According to Turner (1983), Holocene Lake Cahuilla <br />occupied this basin, followed by drying, followed by <br />Wisconsinan Lake Leconte, followed by drying once <br />again. From 1905 to 1907, the basin was flooded with <br />water that broke out of the Colorado River irrigation <br />system. Apparently, these cycles of reconnection have <br />permitted the maintenance of significant variation <br />within local populations. The recent flooding of the Sal- <br />STREAM HIERARCHY MODEL <br />F <br />0.6 <br />Disrupted Flow <br />B <br />fi` <br />1• PUMPING ~~'~ PUMPING <br />C ~ <br />DAM ~ <br />.Oi~ / <br />i ~ <br />DA M <br />~ o.o <br />lo.~ <br />1 <br />\ / <br />\ ~ <br />~ / <br />~ / <br />~ ~ <br />~~ / <br />~~0.0/ <br />~~ <br />1 <br />0.001 0 <br />DA M <br />Ht = H~ + Der + Drs + Dst <br />Figure 2. Graphic representation of the Stream Hierarchy model of poputation structure (Left) Hypothetical <br />natural situation. Sites A~ represent 10 natural populations separated by various probabilities of connectivity. <br />Sites ~ B, C ~ F, and H are springhead~ I is a marsh, and the remainder are stream segments Numbers refer to <br />hypothetical probabilities of connection between that habitat and habitats further upstream over the long terrrg <br />and should not be interpreted as estimates of gene flow (m). (Right) Hypothetical disruption of natural situa- <br />tion. In this case, dams and pumping of springheads have severely altered habitats and probabilities ojgene <br />flow. Two populations (D and I) are extinct and most others have reduced connectivities <br />Conservation Biology <br />Volume 2, No. 2, June 1988 <br />