Laserfiche WebLink
Meffe and V'rijenhoek <br />zoogeographic models must be recognized in manage- <br />mentprograms aimed at habitat restoration and restock- <br />ing of fish populations. <br />The Death Valley Model <br />Death Valley and similaz intermontane basins of the <br />Southwest contain a series of extremely isolated spring- <br />heads and small streams that were connected in piuviai <br />times when the basins were filled by inland lakes and <br />seas (Miller 1948; Hubbs & Miller 1948). Asa conse- <br />quence of natural post-Pleistocene drying wends, these <br />habitats now contain remnant fish populations that were <br />formerly part of a larger interbreeding population. Pres- <br />ently, geographical isolation among colonies is com- <br />plete (m = 0; Fig. 1), and divergence is accelerated by <br />small colony sizes and possibly strong, local selection <br />pressures. <br />Total genetic diversity of a species in this mode! (Ht) <br />consists of diversity within colonies (H~) plus differ- <br />ences among colonies within the total range (D~t) (Nei <br />1975). If a species is endemic to a single locality, then <br />the latter term drops out and total genetic diversity con- <br />sists of heterorygosity within the single site. As colonies <br />lose variation and become more homozygous via ge- <br />netic drift, random differences among colonies also ac- <br />cumulate through time. Since we envision no migration <br />(m = 0) to counteract these processes, both the de- <br />cline of H~ and the growth of Dot are simple functions of <br />Ne within colonies. <br />Depending on its mode of action, natural selection <br />DEATH VALLEY MODEL <br />0 _®_ 0 <br />0 ~~- `~~ 0 <br />~ ~~ <br />D <br />0~ IO <br />\ ~ ~~ <br />~~ <br />0\~ U------~~ 0 <br />0 <br />H t = He + Dc t <br />Figure 1. Graphic representation of the Death Valley <br />model of population structure Isolated springs and <br />streams (represented by Awl) have no chance of nat- <br />ural gene flow among them (m = 0). <br />Conseraton Generics olDesert Fishes 159 <br />will alter the effects of genetic drift. Directional selec- <br />tion may accelerate divergence for locally adaptive <br />traits, but divergence will be slowed for characters that <br />aze under some form of stabilizing or balancing selec- <br />tion throughout the range of the species. This model is <br />exemplified by pupfishes (genus Cyprinodon) and kil- <br />lifishes (genus Empetrtchthys), which aze naturally iso- <br />lated in many remnant springs and streams in Death <br />Valley and adjacent basins in California and Nevada <br />(Miller 1948). <br />Considerable evidence exists for morphological, <br />physiological, behavioral, and life historical differences <br />among populations of desert pupfishes (Naiman & Soltz <br />1981), supporting this model. Turner (1974) was the <br />first investigator to study genetic population structure <br />in these fishes. His electrophoretic studies of pupfishes <br />in and near Death Valley revealed little overall allelic <br />vaziation. However, most vaziation occurred among, <br />rather than within, these remnant populations. For ex- <br />ample, Cyprinodon nevadensu contains three recog- <br />nized subspecies that occur in isolated habitats of the <br />Amargosa basin. Most of the thirty gene loci he exam- <br />ined were homozygous within populations, but four <br />were polymorphic in one population. Cyprinodon di- <br />aboluand G Salinas; which apparently derived from G <br />nevadensis since the drying of Death Valley, presently <br />occur in single isolated habitats, and each species ap- <br />pears to be homorygous at most loci for alleles that <br />occur in G nevadensts. However, each species also con- <br />tains some unique alleles that may have arisen via mu- <br />tation since isolation from the presumed ancestor. Un- <br />fortunately, one cannot compute genetic diversity <br />statistics from the data presented in Turner's pioneering <br />study, but in general the data aze consistent with our <br />model: very little polymorphism occurs within, and con- <br />siderable divergence occurs among, populations. <br />In managing a genetic population structure repre- <br />sented by the Death Valley model, we need not be con- <br />cernedwith human interruption of gene flow. Such gene <br />flow has historically not existed, at least not since an- <br />cestral lakes have desiccated. On the contrary, we <br />should take precautions to avoid creating gene flow <br />among populations that are naturally isolated and may <br />therefore be in the process of adaptive radiation. Artifi- <br />cial gene flow would tend to reduce or eliminate ge- <br />netic divergence among localities (D«), which may rep- <br />resent asubstantial proportion of the genetic diversity <br />in the species. <br />The major concern for fishes in the Death Valley <br />model is maintenance of high Ne within localities. <br />Crashes due to man's intervention have occurred, jeop- <br />azdizing several species' existence. In August 1969, the <br />Owens pupfish (Cyprinodon radiosus) nearly went ex- <br />tinct when its only known habitat completely dried <br />(Miller & Pinter 1971). Fortunately, some 800 fish were <br />Conservation Biology <br />Volume 2, No. 2, June 1988 <br />